It is never good when all you have is "yes people" surrounding you and giving advice. Especially of national security.

This is heading to Americans killing Americans at a higher rate than terrorists killing Americans. This is the sad state of what has to happen, to truly get people to understand that people think and act differently and the diversity and divergent thinking is what really "Made This Country Great". I am not alarming, but it is getting crystal clear already. I am not mad, stunned, passionate, hating, or any of those things. This is exactly what I expected DJT to do. He is living up to what I expected he would do 100%.

Did you point this out as Obama surrounded himself with "yes people?" I would love to read that post, if you made one.

I would be shocked if he's not.

 

I give up.. Horse, water, water, horse. Horse dies of thirst.

I would be shocked if he's not.

 

So the fact that he already disagrees with Torture, right off the bat...that means he's a yes man?

 

He disagrees with Trump and Trump says the he'll defer to the General's thoughts on the subject.

 

Last time he didn't go with the "party line" of the administration he was asked to leave.

 

He may be many things, but I don't think he'll be ab"Yes man" for anyone. He'll agree or disagree based on his own opinion, not the political opinion.

Edited January 29, 20179 yr by Jumper_Dad

Did you point this out as Obama surrounded himself with "yes people?" I would love to read that post, if you made one.

 

Obama is irrelevant now. You can do better than that. ...and I doubt you care to read anything I say. But go look up what you want. You may not agree, but I am consistent.

So the fact that he already disagrees with Torture, right off the bat...that means he's a yes man?

 

He disagrees with Trump and Trump says the he'll defer to the Generals thoughts on the subject.

 

Last time he didn't go with the "party line" of the administration he was asked to leave.

 

He may be many things, but I don't think he'll be ab"Yes man" for anyone. He'll agree or disagree based on his own opinion, not the political opinion.

 

We will see.

It is never good when all you have is "yes people" surrounding you and giving advice. Especially of national security.

 

This is heading to Americans killing Americans at a higher rate than terrorists killing Americans. This is the sad state of what has to happen, to truly get people to understand that people think and act differently and the diversity and divergent thinking is what really "Made This Country Great". I am not alarming, but it is getting crystal clear already. I am not mad, stunned, passionate, hating, or any of those things. This is exactly what I expected DJT to do. He is living up to what I expected he would do 100%.

 

This started well before Trump.

I give up.. Horse, water, water, horse. Horse dies of thirst.

 

The one thing you are missing is Obama got rid of all the Generals who were not yes men.

This started well before Trump.

 

Let me clarify for you. American government forces of some kind killing Americans. Kinda Kent State like on a bigger scale.

Obama is irrelevant now. You can do better than that. ...and I doubt you care to read anything I say. But go look up what you want. You may not agree, but I am consistent.

If you are consistent, then you must have had a real problem with Obama surrounding himself with "yes people." I will assume that you criticized him because it would be hard to find examples where Obama appointees disagreed with their boss publicly.

If you are consistent, then you must have had a real problem with Obama surrounding himself with "yes people." I will assume that you criticized him because it would be hard to find examples where Obama appointees disagreed with their boss publicly.

 

Again, Obama is irrelevant. It makes no difference what Obama did, Bush did, FDR did. DJT holds the position and owns the problems. That's part of the deal. He wanted the position, therefore, he takes the problems. He is dealing with then exactly how I thought. You candy better than give me Obama stuff, but maybe not. That's too easy.

Again, Obama is irrelevant. It makes no difference what Obama did, Bush did, FDR did. DJT holds the position and owns the problems. That's part of the deal. He wanted the position, therefore, he takes the problems. He is dealing with then exactly how I thought. You candy better than give me Obama stuff, but maybe not. That's too easy.

Obama is not irrelevant in determining the hypocrisy of the left. I do not recall any president in my lifetime surrounding himself with a more subservient group of advisers than Obama did. I am just trying to understand why Obama supporters would criticize Trump, who is surrounding himself with a more politically diverse group of advisers than Obama.

 

As others have already pointed out, GEN Mattis disagrees with Trump on water boarding and Trump has stated that he will leave the decision about whether our military resumes the use of water boarding to Mattis. Yet liberals continue to assert that Trump's appointees are "yes people," when they never criticized Obama for actually surrounding himself with "yes people."

Let me clarify for you. American government forces of some kind killing Americans. Kinda Kent State like on a bigger scale.

 

Obama said thats what Cops were doing to citizens every day. Like I said, it started well before Trump.

Obama is not irrelevant in determining the hypocrisy of the left. I do not recall any president in my lifetime surrounding himself with a more subservient group of advisers than Obama did. I am just trying to understand why Obama supporters would criticize Trump, who is surrounding himself with a more politically diverse group of advisers than Obama.

 

As others have already pointed out, GEN Mattis disagrees with Trump on water boarding and Trump has stated that he will leave the decision about whether our military resumes the use of water boarding to Mattis. Yet liberals continue to assert that Trump's appointees are "yes people," when they never criticized Obama for actually surrounding himself with "yes people."

 

Again, Obama is irrelevant, but it is too easy for you. Why are you obsessed with the left? That was rhetorical, because I really don't care. You won! Have fun, enjoy it. We snowflakes don't matter. Ignore us, you have alternate facts. You are in charge. Go get 'em. Leave us alone to hug trees, sing songs, make thousands of trophies (we need to because everyone should get one). You won! Most of us really don't care, just playing around. We certainly don't take ourselves too seriously. You are in charge! Just what you wanted. When in charge, you get criticized. Been happening for a long long time.

Again, Obama is irrelevant, but it is too easy for you. Why are you obsessed with the left? That was rhetorical, because I really don't care. You won! Have fun, enjoy it. We snowflakes don't matter. Ignore us, you have alternate facts. You are in charge. Go get 'em. Leave us alone to hug trees, sing songs, make thousands of trophies (we need to because everyone should get one). You won! Most of us really don't care, just playing around. We certainly don't take ourselves too seriously. You are in charge! Just what you wanted. When in charge, you get criticized. Been happening for a long long time.

 

Enjoy

 

Again, Obama is irrelevant, but it is too easy for you. Why are you obsessed with the left? That was rhetorical, because I really don't care. You won! Have fun, enjoy it. We snowflakes don't matter. Ignore us, you have alternate facts. You are in charge. Go get 'em. Leave us alone to hug trees, sing songs, make thousands of trophies (we need to because everyone should get one). You won! Most of us really don't care, just playing around. We certainly don't take ourselves too seriously. You are in charge! Just what you wanted. When in charge, you get criticized. Been happening for a long long time.

I'm not in charge. My guy lost. I got over it.