REPORT: Top Intelligence Agency Isn’t Backing CIA Assessment Russia Hacked to Help Trump | Mediaite

 

This proves my point. We should all be concerned with Russia hacking. But the hyperbole in the media about knowing the intent of the hackers is nonsense. There is no proof of intent.

We get how many pages on the topic that the Russians hacked to benefit Trump and it goes silent when the CIA's boss says they were wrong.

Because the liberals dont want to hear it on BGP. Dont fit the agenda.

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI)– which oversees every American intelligence agency– isn’t publicly contradicting the CIA assessment, but three anonymous sources tell Reuters that they aren’t on board with it. “ODNI is not arguing that the agency (CIA) is wrong, only that they can’t prove intent,” said one official. “Of course they can’t, absent agents in on the decision-making in Moscow.”

 

Talk about a story built on nothing. 3 anonymous sources from an organization that may or may not support. :lol2:

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI)– which oversees every American intelligence agency– isn’t publicly contradicting the CIA assessment, but three anonymous sources tell Reuters that they aren’t on board with it. “ODNI is not arguing that the agency (CIA) is wrong, only that they can’t prove intent,” said one official. “Of course they can’t, absent agents in on the decision-making in Moscow.”

 

Talk about a story built on nothing. 3 anonymous sources from an organization that may or may not support. :lol2:

 

Non story? The office that the CIA reports to says they were wrong and the FBI disagrees with the CIA conclusion.

Non story? The office that the CIA reports to says they were wrong and the FBI disagrees with the CIA conclusion.

 

AS JJ said, it doesn't fit the Liberal agenda.

 

Wikileaks says it didn't come from Russia but from right here in the good old USA.

 

The Libs don't want the truth, they just want to blame Russia.

The sources from the ODNI are quibbling over whether there's enough evidence to say the Russian hacking was intended to help Trump or merely (and I say this with such sarcasm it should leave a greasy spot on your screen) to subvert our democracy.

 

The way people are responding to this makes it sound like the ODNI said the Russians weren't involved, when that's not what these sources said.

 

I hope one day people sober up and approach this with clearer heads. But we've fully politicized our intelligence agencies because we don't like what they said. We are in a very bad place.

The sources from the ODNI are quibbling over whether there's enough evidence to say the Russian hacking was intended to help Trump or merely (and I say this with such sarcasm it should leave a greasy spot on your screen) to subvert our democracy.

 

The way people are responding to this makes it sound like the ODNI said the Russians weren't involved, when that's not what these sources said.

 

I hope one day people sober up and approach this with clearer heads. But we've fully politicized our intelligence agencies because we don't like what they said. We are in a very bad place.

 

I have said that for awhile. I think we are worse off and more divided than alot think. Habib you are a smart guy so I would think that you understand that when there is change that the change has already happened way before we as a society ever recognizes it. Thats the way life is. By the time we put all the facts together usually the change has already occurred. We are divided to a point of having big problems and very few see this I think. Not a knock on anyone, just my prospective. Think about this carefully and tell me what you think.

The sources from the ODNI are quibbling over whether there's enough evidence to say the Russian hacking was intended to help Trump or merely (and I say this with such sarcasm it should leave a greasy spot on your screen) to subvert our democracy.

 

The way people are responding to this makes it sound like the ODNI said the Russians weren't involved, when that's not what these sources said.

 

I hope one day people sober up and approach this with clearer heads. But we've fully politicized our intelligence agencies because we don't like what they said. We are in a very bad place.

 

I never once stated someone in Russia did not hack the DNC. What still can not be proven and what this Office said was the motive behind the attacks is unclear. There is no evidence to suggest the reason behind the hacking was to get Trump in office and the papers who ran with these headlines were irresponsible.

Julian Assange associate: It was a leak, not a hack and the DNC insider is NOT Russian | EndingFed News Network

 

Posted in other thread.

While we are fighting amongst ourselves and the FBI, CIA, NSA and any other intelligence agency all have differing theories. And a lame duck in Washington, I just hope no one from the axis of evil lobs a bomb at us.

Julian Assange associate: It was a leak, not a hack and the DNC insider is NOT Russian | EndingFed News Network

 

Posted in other thread.

 

And Im sure the leak was found and killed. Now the Dems are just trying to play the RED SCARE CARD and take spotlight off of the inside job. It was probably Seth Rich who was the leak, and he was murdered and still open case.

And Im sure the leak was found and killed. Now the Dems are just trying to play the RED SCARE CARD and take spotlight off of the inside job. It was probably Seth Rich who was the leak, and he was murdered and still open case.

 

Probably not far off base with that thought.

Probably not far off base with that thought.

 

I know more than 1 person knows the truth and I wish somehow it would come out that the Dems had him killed. But for someone to be ordered to be murdered, it has to come from a pretty high ranking official and Im sure they have connections to hired killers. And Im sure it cost a lot and maybe the money comes from George Soros.

And Im sure the killer is probably dead too.