September 22, 201610 yr This show could not be more disappointing. I've always felt that Simmons was too bright of a talent who was handcuffed by a PG rated ESPN network. He was muzzled due to ESPN's numerous relationships with the NFL, NBA, etc. He gets the perfect stage (HBO) to do something fresh and creative, without recourse, and he delivers this turd on a platter. This show could not be any more basic and boring. To say this show is a huge disappointment is an understatement. Agree or disagree?
September 22, 201610 yr Agree, mostly. I like most of the interviews but they seem unnaturally short. I'd be happy with a 5 minute monolog and 25 minute interview with one person or group. Seems to be trying to pack 10lb in a 5lb bag...it just isn't working.
September 23, 201610 yr I was excited at first but it's just ok now. I watch but I watch on dvr when nothing else to watch.
September 23, 201610 yr Author Agree, mostly. I like most of the interviews but they seem unnaturally short. I'd be happy with a 5 minute monolog and 25 minute interview with one person or group. Seems to be trying to pack 10lb in a 5lb bag...it just isn't working. I've noticed that too. It seems like Bill cuts off his interviews too quickly and moves on. Poor editing?
September 23, 201610 yr 30 minutes is too short for Simmons. We're talking about the dude who wrote a 15,000 word piece to save a team he had no rooting interest in. The guy needs time and space to go off on the tangents that make his writing and podcasts so enjoyable.
September 23, 201610 yr 30 minutes is too short for Simmons. We're talking about the dude who wrote a 15,000 word piece to save a team he had no rooting interest in. The guy needs time and space to go off on the tangents that make his writing and podcasts so enjoyable. His podcasts are much better.
September 23, 201610 yr I've noticed that too. It seems like Bill cuts off his interviews too quickly and moves on. Poor editing? Definitely. I bet they film 15 minutes to a half hour or more with each guest and only air 5 minutes. There's no sense of continuity even within a single interview. His podcasts are much better. Agreed. I think they compare favorably to his writing as well.
September 23, 201610 yr His NBA Draft articles, and his mailbag segments, were absolute MUST READS back in the day.
September 23, 201610 yr His NBA Draft articles, and his mailbag segments, were absolute MUST READS back in the day. Don't forget the classic sports movie reviews. Still love where he watched "Hoosiers" with the intent to construct a box score for the state final game.
September 24, 201610 yr Author If you get a chance, google his 'Bane of the Ballpark' article from the early 2000's. I revisit that piece at least once a year. Very funny and accurate.
October 6, 201610 yr If you get a chance, google his 'Bane of the Ballpark' article from the early 2000's. I revisit that piece at least once a year. Very funny and accurate. Can this be found anywhere?
October 7, 201610 yr Can this be found anywhere? This is the link. But I warn you, ESPN's loathing over its former favorite son made it difficult to get it to stop on that article without redirecting. ESPN.com: Page 2 : Bane of the ballpark
October 7, 201610 yr Author This is the link. But I warn you, ESPN's loathing over its former favorite son made it difficult to get it to stop on that article without redirecting. ESPN.com: Page 2 : Bane of the ballpark One of the greatest Simmons articles ever!
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.