How do you take any group seriously when they named themselves the Honkies...

If the question of this thread was about the proper use of infrared, then shouldn't the title of the thread at least hint at that? Or did you use the title of the article because you knew it would get more views?

It's a cop bash, nothing more. That was the entire point of my first post in this thread. Tiresome.

It's a cop bash, nothing more. That was the entire point of my first post in this thread. Tiresome.

It's either you're being confrontational or your ignorant

It's either you're being confrontational or your ignorant

And you're delusional. Just own it.

It's either you're being confrontational or your ignorant

 

I'm not going to go as far as saying that your intentions were to bash cops, but it is a little interesting that the topic you allegedly wanted to discuss is not mentioned at all in the thread title.

And you're delusional. Just own it.

 

No, you are, lol. Again, you either throw out tripe or you're ignorant, as you either ignore or can't comprehend the "but I would like to know what people feel about the other issue, the use of infrared cameras".

 

Perhaps you want to ignore the facts and read into what wasn't intended so that you can start your crap again with someone.

 

And your accusations are way off, if you knew my career you would see how off base you are on your accusations. Sad how others can come into the thread, such as Clyde, and see the intent and add to the thread instead of going in a direction that wasn't intended.

I call it like I see it, and this is typical stuff for you to post. I don't care what your career is. You might be a pole dancer for all I know. Maybe you're a banker. Maybe you're a security guard. I don't care. The fact remains that you continue to toss these threads out that bash the police. Sure some of that stuff happens, but before you bother to investigate, you just toss out the garbage. So, you keep perusing that site for your fodder and I'll keep calling it like I see it. Keep backpedaling, it's your m.o.

I call it like I see it, and this is typical stuff for you to post. I don't care what your career is. You might be a pole dancer for all I know. Maybe you're a banker. Maybe you're a security guard. I don't care. The fact remains that you continue to toss these threads out that bash the police. Sure some of that stuff happens, but before you bother to investigate, you just toss out the garbage. So, you keep perusing that site for your fodder and I'll keep calling it like I see it. Keep backpedaling, it's your m.o.

 

Then it must be ignorance, judging by some of your previous posts. And you should care what my career is as you would see that you are way off base. If you want to fantasize that a thread is about something other than what it was intended, well that's your lose. Sad how others can get right into the intent and comment about that but you refuse to so you can go on with your usual crap.

:popcorn:

Then it must be ignorance, judging by some of your previous posts. And you should care what my career is as you would see that you are way off base. If you want to fantasize that a thread is about something other than what it was intended, well that's your lose. Sad how others can get right into the intent and comment about that but you refuse to so you can go on with your usual crap.

first, who got it right? Sure wasn't you, seems this is your typical practice. Here's another thread you started to sling crap that was later rebuffed. Just what the hell do you google anyway?

 

http://bluegrasspreps.com/controversial-issues/growing-right-wing-318760.html#post5782335

Oops, here's another. But when someone dug a little deeper the thread didn't go the way you started it and then you backpedal and retract. Later even warning of crossing the LEOs. I don't get your angle, but you keep doin' you.

 

http://bluegrasspreps.com/controversial-issues/sheriff-deputies-la-318641.html

There is the issue about the mistake, but I would like to know what people feel about the other issue, the use of infrared cameras.

 

It could be seen as invasion of privacy, use the technology to spy on people? Then find something so that you can get a warrent to go in?

 

Kansas cops demolish single mom?s home and destroy children?s Christmas tree ? by mistake

 

I dont disagree with police using infrared cameras to search a house and find potential hidden dangers.

It sure would have helped the cop in Richmond avoid an ambush when he went room to room looking for suspect.

I dont disagree with police using infrared cameras to search a house and find potential hidden dangers.

It sure would have helped the cop in Richmond avoid an ambush when he went room to room looking for suspect.

 

That's different. That's allowed b/c the officer would already be in the house.

I haven't read any of this thread but we are getting too many reported posts from it.

 

Remember everyone, stick to the issues, not each other.