Surprised this hasn't been posted here just yet. Thought it would make for a good discussion. Looks like Mr. Chase has ruffled some feathers.... Have a read: Kentucky?s perfect season still isn?t as impressive as Kansas? | For The Win

Not a whole lot to argue using his measuring stick.

 

Why would fans get upset at this?

First line of the article = First thing’s first: Kentucky (30-0, No. 1 ranking) has had a much better season than Kansas (24-6, No. 10 ranking).

 

Also known as, if I say something about UK in the headline/title of my crap article, I'll get more clicks.

Smart "web journalism"? Not sure the appropriate term. He makes some good points, but that title screams "This is going to get me a few more clicks from the BBN so that I look good for my boss".

:laugh::laugh::laugh:

Smart "web journalism"? Not sure the appropriate term. He makes some good points, but that title screams "This is going to get me a few more clicks from the BBN so that I look good for my boss".

 

I think "click-bait" is the word you are looking for. And it doesn't look good because it's just so desperate.

Not a whole lot to argue using his measuring stick.

 

Why would fans get upset at this?

 

Because Kentucky fans leave no stone unturned in their search for slights?

I am responding to this tread, but I will NOT click on his article.

I think it says more about the Big 12 then KU.

 

KU wouldn't have won the SEC in 06,07, 10, 12, 14, or 15.

After reading through it again click bait is definitely a fitting term. His argument strays drastically from the title. It just seems like a Big 12 twelve love fest.

 

Side note, he mentions it in his article, but I don't get the hate on UK's schedule... But I'm just a biased UK fan so...

I just found the line about Texas being a national power under Rick Barnes to be comedy gold.

At 30-0 people are getting desperate for topics.