November 8, 201312 yr Except for the fact that UofL out rebounded it's first two opponents without three of the top seven rotation. :lol2: What powerhouse teams were those? Was anyone over 6'4"?
November 8, 201312 yr Except for the fact that UofL out rebounded it's first two opponents without three of the top seven rotation. :lol2: Well, that was Pikeville and Kentucky Wesleyan. Obviously Behanan will be a huge help as the season progresses and the competition gets tougher.
November 8, 201312 yr What powerhouse teams were those? Was anyone over 6'4"? Well, that was Pikeville and Kentucky Wesleyan. Obviously Behanan will be a huge help as the season progresses and the competition gets tougher. Chane is the shortest post player on the team. To say that the reason he is on his way back is because Pitino realized his team couldn't rebound is simply wrong. As I already said, from the beginning, Behanan's return was always a possibilty. Not sure why this is a surprise.
November 8, 201312 yr Love the Deuce... Dude is UL to the bone they should give you free tix to defend them at this point!
November 8, 201312 yr Love the Deuce... Dude is UL to the bone they should give you free tix to defend them at this point! I will always shoot down incorrect posts trying to take shots at my school. :thumb:
November 8, 201312 yr Chane is the shortest post player on the team. To say that the reason he is on his way back is because Pitino realized his team couldn't rebound is simply wrong. As I already said, from the beginning, Behanan's return was always a possibilty. Not sure why this is a surprise. I didn't mean my post as a knock on Behanan or Louisville. And I'm certainly not surprised he is back; I'm not totally sure why he was suspended in the first place. But obviously a player of his ability will be helpful to the team, especially once they move out of exhibition play and into the meatier portion of their slate. That's all I intended.
November 8, 201312 yr I will always shoot down incorrect posts trying to take shots at my school. :thumb: You also turn your head on a lot but I'm sure we all do.
November 8, 201312 yr You also turn your head on a lot but I'm sure we all do. What have I turned my head on? Chane is a pothead, said that when this issue first broke...
November 8, 201312 yr I didn't mean my post as a knock on Behanan or Louisville. And I'm certainly not surprised he is back; I'm not totally sure why he was suspended in the first place. But obviously a player of his ability will be helpful to the team, especially once they move out of exhibition play and into the meatier portion of their slate. That's all I intended. The majority of that post wasn't directed at you, you just happened to be caught in the crossfire... He is obviously a large contributor to the team, no doubt about it. Louisville would more than likely be more successful in the line up, but some are acting like it was never a possibility for him to return. That isn't the case, and it never was. So they have to throw something against the wall as a reason for his return and hope it sticks.
November 8, 201312 yr I'm not sure why there is so much confusion. It was said almost immediately that Behanan could be back by as early as December. He hasn't played yet, and it's not December. You guys must be bored. What was said immediately? Not almost immediately but immediately.
November 8, 201312 yr What was said immediately? Not almost immediately but immediately. In Pitino's first press conference after it went down, he said indefinite suspension... I've always taken that as a possibility to return.
November 8, 201312 yr What was said immediately? Not almost immediately but immediately. What was immediately said was that Behanan was "indefinitely suspended".
November 8, 201312 yr He said: - Off the team due to violating University rules - It was possible for him to come back but not probable - He had a chance to get back on the team but didn't hold up his end of the bargain Then: - He could possibly be back by mid December. And by the way, you can be a great rebounder and not be really tall. Charles Barkley comes to mind.
November 8, 201312 yr He said: - Off the team due to violating University rules - It was possible for him to come back but not probable - He had a chance to get back on the team but didn't hold up his end of the bargain Then: - He could possibly be back by mid December. And by the way, you can be a great rebounder and not be really tall. Charles Barkley comes to mind. He obviously can't be a "part of the team" if he was suspended from the University. So, he initially said it was possible for him to come back... Then he said it again. He's still not technically "back" yet, as he hasn't played. Where is the confusion?
November 8, 201312 yr Ask how long was the suspension, Pintino answered "I forgot" I say let him play but I find the whole Pitino double talking laughable. He would make a great ventriloquist.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.