Like I said BC by 26 :cry:

Oh ZB you crack me up. Funny how you turned it into an Ashland thing. And I believe that there was a thread closed last week with several questions regarding the "classless" Royals. You may be singing a different tune when your "mighty" Tomcats will face the little Royals in a district showdown. Bet they don't forfeit or get tweaked on a technicality. You had just better hope the Hyde doesn't beat Dr. Jekyll to Summit that night. If he does, I'll be glad to give you a lift to Morehead to watch the regional tournament. :cry:

 

:lol:

This one wont be as close as most think.

BC 81

RH 60

This one will be CLOSER than people think :thumb:

but I dont think Rose Hill is ready to get over the hump yet, Boyd County by 8

I think Rose Hill will give the Tomcats a run for there money in the districs.

This one will be CLOSER than people think :thumb:

but I dont think Rose Hill is ready to get over the hump yet, Boyd County by 8

I disagree, Boyd County by 7

Jackson may do a fairly decent job on Owens

I disagree, Boyd County by 7

Jackson may do a fairly decent job on Owens

How would you define a fairly decent job whenever it applies to Owens?? If he only gets his avg of 30 does that qualify?

How would you define a fairly decent job whenever it applies to Owens?? If he only gets his avg of 30 does that qualify?

depends if he gets 30 points on 40 shots or 20

big difference

Oh ZB you crack me up. Funny how you turned it into an Ashland thing. And I believe that there was a thread closed last week with several questions regarding the "classless" Royals. You may be singing a different tune when your "mighty" Tomcats will face the little Royals in a district showdown. Bet they don't forfeit or get tweaked on a technicality. You had just better hope the Hyde doesn't beat Dr. Jekyll to Summit that night. If he does, I'll be glad to give you a lift to Morehead to watch the regional tournament. :cry:

 

Hey spindoc -

 

Correct me if I'm wrong, but in that thread that got closed last week, weren't you the one that was saying you hoped Rose Hill crushes opponents over the next few years, if they get the chance?

 

If I'm not mistaken, most of the teams in the 16th have done a pretty good job of NOT running it up on Rose Hill these last couple of seasons, when they had the opportunity to.

 

I just want to be sure that I'm getting your message right on this one.

 

Frances

If Rosehill dont forfeit BC WINS BY 26

 

 

If ZoneBuster23 doesn't learn how to speak, or write properly, then he/she may have trouble securing a good job later in life.

Hey spindoc -

 

Correct me if I'm wrong, but in that thread that got closed last week, weren't you the one that was saying you hoped Rose Hill crushes opponents over the next few years, if they get the chance?

 

If I'm not mistaken, most of the teams in the 16th have done a pretty good job of NOT running it up on Rose Hill these last couple of seasons, when they had the opportunity to.

 

I just want to be sure that I'm getting your message right on this one.

 

Frances

 

No. If you'll reread I said that the incident would harbor harsh feelings between schools. This would lead to more hard feelings if the score wound up lopsided as a result of this in the future. I also said there was an easy solution. And quite frankly Bea, why wouldn't anyone want to correct this thing by playing one basketball game? And as far as my message is concerned. Why do I constantly get the feeling that you can't help but defend everything maroon? IMO, you continually, when it is convenient, put up a facade of being pro 16th, all about the kids, etc.,etc., yet you seldom come to the defense of the likes of Fairview, RH, etc.. In this instance, there was no reason to place that post when all mine was intended to do was to defend RH from any more slander than it has already taken, especially by those who don't have the first clue about the situation. So forgive me for saying, but if we could place a collander under your posts, only the maroon would remain. And you know what I truly enjoy is your style. You start out abrasive and feign some sort of politically correctness by stating in a separate closing sentence "I just want to be sure that I'm getting your message right on this one". With that said, I'm quite sure I'll get an eloquent response filled with your history of uprightness, etc.. Bea, just defending the Hill, can't help it. The same collander would reveal the blue posts for me, I'm just not ashamed to say it.

Rose Hill has been in every game they have played this year. I think they will be in this one. I will go with Boyd by 14.

 

Couple of side notes.

 

Rose Hill will retire David Garnes number before the game. Coach Pratt has agreed to participate in the cerimony. I can tell you that he has been great to work with concerning this.

 

Concerning the forfeit. Why was West allowed to participate in the consolation game?

If Rosehill dont forfeit BC WINS BY 26

Come on now :lol: That's a little funny! I think Boyd Co. wins but 26 is a stretch! I'll say Boyd Co. by 10!!! By the wat Coach Pratt, Stacy, Lemaster, and Sparks ARE CLASS ACTS. It is a nice touch that they are helping in the jersey retiring ceremony for David Garnes! :thumb:

By the wat Coach Pratt, Stacy, Lemaster, and Sparks ARE CLASS ACTS. It is a nice touch that they are helping in the jersey retiring ceremony for David Garnes! :thumb:

 

Coach Pratt,,,,the best :thumb: :thumb:

Coach Pratt,,,,the best :thumb: :thumb:

 

I think he gets the bigger picture. Classy or not I hope he gets beat on Tuesday.

I think he gets the bigger picture. Classy or not I hope he gets beat on Tuesday.

 

I wish I could say I could see that happening, but Owens will do well and Boyd will win by 15 IMO.