TheDeuce

I'm talking about the most recent years. Nothing in Pope's past would indicate he would perform better in the post season than Cal did the last six years.

Close only counts in horse shoes and hand grenades. Saying Pope will have more post season success than Cal is based on nothing other than hopes and dreams.

This goes without saying, but we obviously agree that won't get it done at UK.

That's a pretty bold assumption. How has Pope constructed his rosters in the past? Why hasn't he had any post season success to this point?

Based on what? His post-season success to date?

To me it's no different than a private school. Most private schools do not provide transportation. If you want your kid to go there, you have to get them there.

Completely agree. It's much easier to win with a starting five full of seniors than it is with freshman, regardless of how many stars they had coming out of high school. Cal doesn't get enough credit for that.

I understand that Cal "under achieved" the last handful of years, but I just think that the people that pushed him out are going to look silly when Pope is no better, if not worse. Pope is not going to get the quality of players Cal did, he's just not. That being the case, you'd have to argue that he's a better coach than Cal. Can you really do that? What about his resume says that's the case? Pope has zero hardware in his trophy case. This feels like a serious case of "be careful what you wish for." Pope feels good to some, for now, but how long will that last?

Looks like an awesome facility. Where is it in relation to the school?

Do people think Mark Pope is going to win more than that?

I think what would speak more to that is asking players that actually played for him...

It's never enough for LeBron.

Whoever is running that league shouldn't be... That's one of the more embarrassing things I've read in a while.

A pretty meaningless stat considering their overall record and quick exit.

LeBron isn't going to take any minimum.