big royal daddy

Thanks for the info sportsfan76, the new gym just looks and feels bigger. Why didn't they build a bigger gyn when they built the school?

Was having a disscussion today with some friends and was just wondering why the girls tournament has been held at the Middle School instead of the High School. Have been to both locations and it seems the High School has more parking and more seating. Also being the newer facility why they didn't have the tournament there? Just curious, if any poster's form the Campbell Co. area has any answers, would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.:confused:

Campbell Co. won by 2

I know back in 1965 that the KHSAA moved Bryan Station to the 10th Region for one year only. Was to young to understand why, but maybe someone else on here could elaborate.

Congratulations on a fine career!:dancingpa

I made a little mistake on Estill Co. being in the 12th region back then, they came from the 14th and then went back to the 14th after the last realignment.

Forgot about old Mt. Sterling High. Played there in, I think 1974. I believe that was their last year before the merger. If I'm not mistaken Estill Co. was in the 12th Region before moving to the 10th.

39th used to be Mason Co., Maysville, St. Patrick, Fleming Co., and Tollesboro

Final 55-37 Lady Royals

Half-time 34-20 Lady Royals. 52% shooting, Brossart 32.2%

Mason scores on a lay-up, 31-18, Brossart calls time-out.

Cline scores a basket and free throw puts Mason up 29-18 with 2 min to go in half.

Brossart scores 2:15 to go 26-18.

Litzinger at the line, hits the first misses the 2nd. 26-16

Menke at the line, misses the first, and the second. 25-16.

Litzinger just scores puts Lady Royals up 23-16 in the first quarter.

Just turned the radio on to listen to Mason Co. and heard the final score. Lady Fillies win 49 to 36 if I heard correctly. Didn't see this comming.

I dont see the 10th Region powers to be agreeing on a three year deal like the 9th Region. Montgomery Co. is going to want to host at least every 4th year as is Mason Co. I can see the 38th District voting to have NKU host at least once and everyone else in the 10th whether or not they will say it publically or not would like to play it at least once there too. It's all going to come down to the money earned or lost by having it at another location other than the Fieldhouse. Montgomery Co. is on the hot seat this year as far as hosting a good tourny which I am sure they will do with their fine facilities. But every one on this site and those who are not know that the first time this week that someone is turned away because of a sold out crowd all the complaints and bashers will come out of the woodwork. This will be said the same for the NKU folks hosting the tournament and 10th Region officials complaining they want to much of a take for hosting the tournament and everyone saying lets move it back the way it was before. I'm not saying that other people don't deserve a chance to host but we all know how tinkering with something that is a proven moneymaker can play havoc with some people. Good or bad, right or wrong, the days of Mason Co. hosting the 10th Regional Tournament for extended peroiods of time are over with.

Had to listen on the radio and couldn't attend. I belive the radio reported that Augusta shot 64 or 65 percent the first half. The difference in the score being 17 turnovers the first half for the Panthers. Might have been a little closer if they could have handled the pressure. Hope to see Augusta give someone fits next week.

Sorry I did'nt read the newspaper article before posting. I guess the tenth region is still in the mix for moving to NKU on a rotating basis.

I guess this announcement takes the tenth region out of the mix now. Just the constant bickering between Mason Co. hosting supporters and the supporters of Montgomery Co. hosting is all thats left. Can't wait to see the new facility. Good luck next year to the ninth region. I saw the post asking how the money will be disbursed. Curious to know what NKU's cut will be if any.

Sorry about that Gold, but I was trying to make the point about schedule restrictions which was easier to do on the boys schedule. But as for the Mason Co. girls they would have had to drop 1 game to play Augusta at least one time and probably drop a holiday tourny schedule to fit the minimum amount of regional games that would be required under my scenario. I personally feel you should be required to play all district opponents and a set number of regional opponents regardless of how the post season tournaments are drawn.

Congratulations to Coach Kelsch and the Augusta faithful. You gotta love this time of the year, especially in this region!

I guess I'm in the minority on the blind draw. But one question hasn't been addressed on the seeding. If seeding is made the rule for all districts and say for regionals too, wheather it's girls or boys teams, I think you'll see some schools complain about scheduling district and regional opponents instead of higher profile games. I feel if your going to seed, then you should play each district opponent twice, home & away, and the rest of the region once, alternating home games everyother year. In the case of Mason Co. for instance the boys would have been affected worse than than the girls, but they would of had to drop a few higher profile games to accomodate the required minimum amount of games for district and regional seeding games. Just in case some people didn't realize that the Mason boys didn't play a single regular season district game, they would have been forced to drop 3 games against non-region opponents. If those games dropped would have been all home games, just for example purposes, they may not have played Scott Co., Elliott Co., and Bryan Station a second time. Just some food for thought.

Congratulations Kenny Ray! I won't hold being a Louisville fan against you. LOL! Your a asset to the program.:dancingpa