Mr. Network

Sounds like you are the one thats misinformed and thats "stupid " of you to use the word "stupid."

Mr. Network

Sounds like you are the one thats misinformed and thats "stupid " of you to use the word "stupid."

 

Ask anybody you want in Lincoln County whether I am misinformed or stupid about this subject. Ask Coach Jaggers if you want...I think he will agree that I am knowledgeable about it.

 

PM me if you don't know who I am and I will give you my name so you can ask around.

I know who you are and you are still misinformed. Im not saying you personally were one of those people.

that is not the answer to the question. They had 7 turnovers and the long field all night, bardstown had the short field all night. That is why they lost. Coaches cannot hold onto the ball for them. Get it straight, i dont coach for the ads. Promise u that.

What question you want answered? I knew I would lose you once I explained you over/under crap. What question do you want answered? I will answer if you answer some of mine?

that is not the answer to the question. They had 7 turnovers and the long field all night, bardstown had the short field all night. That is why they lost. Coaches cannot hold onto the ball for them. Get it straight, i dont coach for the ads. Promise u that.

Maybe if the play calling was better......it wouldn't have been a long field.......ever thought of that. Its called do what you do best to get a lead then work on other things!

I know who you are and you are still misinformed. Im not saying you personally were one of those people.

 

I just re-read your post to see if I missed something. You stated:

 

I couldn't have said it better oldschool. The people at Lincoln are the ones who bashed him. I guess they didn't like winning.

 

 

I replied:

 

 

You are painting with a broad brush. I do not know anyone at Lincoln who (1) badmouthed Jaggers, (2) was glad to see him leave or (3) didn't like winning.

 

I don't see how I am misinformed. We'll just have to leave it at that.

an over or under defense is not an overload to one side. Just read what you wrote and tell me if that makes sense.

"its a form of 43 defense where backers and line shift if needed to where if may to overload to one side." What? It is not an overload. It is predicated on the first down lineman in a 4 down front to the strong side, be it a TE, the field if there are no TE's, and also the field with two TE's in a balaced formation. If i have a 1 technique to the strong side then it will be an under, which is generally coupled with a 5 and 9 technique as well if the TE is strong. On the backside there will be a 3 and a 5 tech. There are variations to an over and under that get into other techniques and shades. An over would have a 3 and a 6,7 or 9 tech. front side. There are other things to consider but i dont need to go too much into depth, i've probably lost you already. It is still a balanced front. That is what you are looking for on defense for the most part is to balance out the offensive formation. Why would i overload on defense, just so the offense can run a play away from it? Think about it. What question do you have that i cant answer about the game? nothing. Not your fault, you just don't know the game other then from a fans perspective and that consist of watching the ball after the snap. I dont watch the ball. You learn that way. Why do you think they had the long field? As i stated before they had 7 turnovers. That's why. Goodness gracious.

I think this is a good place to end this one...