May 7, 201016 yr Why not go after the businesses that hire the illegal aliens? All I seem to hear is going after the illegals (which is fine) but if you cut off the money supply that entices them over the border, I guarantee that flood will become more of a trickle. :thumb: Amen! And what about the illegals with illegal documentation? They DO pay taxes under their illegal social security number. If a business pays in cash, or checks to an employee, aren't they required to file 1099's or something?
May 7, 201016 yr Commando...you are cracking me up. You are so obsessed with Obama I think you may make the CIA watch list if you keep it up.Is Obama not pushing amnesty for illegals?? He says its not going to be a free ride but there is already a way for them to be here legally.. Laugh all you want.. More Americans agree with me...
May 8, 201016 yr :thumb: I don't care where they spend their money. They are breaking our laws by being here. The feds need to do their freakin jobs and deport them.:thumb::thumb::thumb::thumb:
May 8, 201016 yr Why not go after the businesses that hire the illegal aliens? All I seem to hear is going after the illegals (which is fine) but if you cut off the money supply that entices them over the border, I guarantee that flood will become more of a trickle. :thumb: Obviously you have not read the actual AZ bill. It does punish the businesses, as well as the illegal alien.
May 8, 201016 yr Obviously you have not read the actual AZ bill. It does punish the businesses, as well as the illegal alien. So did the previous law. What does this one do differently?
May 8, 201016 yr So did the previous law. What does this one do differently? From what I can tell, the only difference between the previous law & the new bill in regards to employers is that, under the new bill, the employer can establish an affirmative defense by claiming "entrapment." Nonetheless, employers can (and will be) punished for intentionally hiring illegal aliens, under both the new & prior law.
May 8, 201016 yr From what I can tell, the only difference between the previous law & the new bill in regards to employers is that, under the new bill, the employer can establish an affirmative defense by claiming "entrapment." Nonetheless, employers can (and will be) punished for intentionally hiring illegal aliens, under both the new & prior law. Seems pretty useless, then...as a new law.
May 8, 201016 yr The new law gives Arizona the right to enforce the federal laws... Things they could not do before like deportation.. Before they had to turn them over to the Feds who simply did little or nothing at all..
May 8, 201016 yr The problem is this with the money they make. Most of it goes back to MX to their families instead of being spent in USA. This hurts our econmy. Do I blame them, NO, do I like it NO. Make them legal so they can pay their share of taxes. How do you feel about businesses like Toyota getting huge tax breaks from American cities and not having to pay taxes for many, many years, all the while sending money back to Japan? And that is legal.
May 9, 201016 yr Obviously you have not read the actual AZ bill. It does punish the businesses, as well as the illegal alien. My point was not about the law but the rhetoric. Seems that is a very back burner talking point on here or practically anywhere when it should be upfront and center with the illegal immigration problem. :thumb:
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.