Blue Magic Posted March 8, 2010 Posted March 8, 2010 Nooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Mike Brown is settling for the cheaper player once again. This obviously doesn't mean that the Bengals will automatically sign him, but it does show where their head's at.
saint4 Posted March 8, 2010 Posted March 8, 2010 This means that they have decided to persue him instead of TO and Marshall IMO. Bad decision, but this means we get to keep our first round pick, but I would still like Marshall instead.
ukfan36 Posted March 8, 2010 Posted March 8, 2010 Bryant will go after the ball i have seen many highlights of him jumping for the ball and making the catch he reminds me of TJ.
stick1 Posted March 8, 2010 Posted March 8, 2010 Boldin? Marshall? Heck even TO? No lets get Bryant. Makes sense :irked:
SportsGuy41017 Posted March 8, 2010 Posted March 8, 2010 Tank Johnson just resigned!!!! ? He tweeted about an hour ago he was coming back.
CatsCatsCats Posted March 8, 2010 Posted March 8, 2010 Are you guys surprised or just angry and let down?
Original Rookie Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 Are you guys surprised or just angry and let down? Way too early for that. If they get Bryant and nobody else then yes, I'll be very upset. Bryant can play some ball and could help this team with other additions at receiver.
Blue Magic Posted March 9, 2010 Author Posted March 9, 2010 Are you guys surprised or just angry and let down? Not surprised at all. Angry, let down, disgusted, confused, lost, etc. Typical move by Mike Brown. It's one thing to be cheap but to be cheap when you come across a player like Brandon Marshall and a 1st round pick is nearly all that you're giving up for him and you don't jump on him, you jump on the cheaper, weaker, older, less talented guy, it makes me sick. I guess this is all Bengal fans are going to have to live with for a long time. Things aren't changing when we have such a good defense and running game and all we need is a dominant physical pass catcher to stretch the field (i.e. Brandon Marshall) and we don't jump on him when we clearly could. Makes me want to :puke: Always trying to come by a steal or a bargain when clearly there's a perfect player right in front of their faces. Spend some money Mike, you penny pinching moron. For the record, I'm only angry that we're not pursuing Brandon Marshall, not the fact that we might sign Bryant. I think he's still a good receiver but just not even close to Marshall.
cooperstown Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 Bryant is common. The Bengals have a slew of common WR's. They need a #1 and he isn't it. You go cheap and you end up with people like Coles.
CatsCatsCats Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 Not surprised at all. Angry, let down, disgusted, confused, lost, etc. Typical move by Mike Brown. It's one thing to be cheap but to be cheap when you come across a player like Brandon Marshall and a 1st round pick is nearly all that you're giving up for him and you don't jump on him, you jump on the cheaper, weaker, older, less talented guy, it makes me sick. I guess this is all Bengal fans are going to have to live with for a long time. Things aren't changing when we have such a good defense and running game and all we need is a dominant physical pass catcher to stretch the field (i.e. Brandon Marshall) and we don't jump on him when we clearly could. Makes me want to :puke: Always trying to come by a steal or a bargain when clearly there's a perfect player right in front of their faces. Spend some money Mike, you penny pinching moron. For the record, I'm only angry that we're not pursuing Brandon Marshall, not the fact that we might sign Bryant. I think he's still a good receiver but just not even close to Marshall. While I'm far from a Bengals fan I agree with everything you've said. Bryant isn't bad but it's kind of like passing up Eva Longoria because you think Kate Winslet would be easier to get.
Blue Magic Posted March 9, 2010 Author Posted March 9, 2010 While I'm far from a Bengals fan I agree with everything you've said. Bryant isn't bad but it's kind of like passing up Eva Longoria because you think Kate Winslet would be easier to get. And a cheaper date :sssh:
Original Rookie Posted March 9, 2010 Posted March 9, 2010 While I'm far from a Bengals fan I agree with everything you've said. Bryant isn't bad but it's kind of like passing up Eva Longoria because you think Kate Winslet would be easier to get. Oh I forgot, let's overreact because this has already happened :idunno:
Blue Magic Posted March 9, 2010 Author Posted March 9, 2010 Oh I forgot, let's overreact because this has already happened :idunno: When Mike Brown calls Brandon Marshall to meet in Cincy then I'll retract my statements. It's the fact that were looking at the cheaper receivers instead of Marshall it has nothing to do with overreacting because we think he's already signing a contract.
Blue Magic Posted March 9, 2010 Author Posted March 9, 2010 I read that Bryant is probably asking too much for even the Redskins and Dolphins to sign him. I just don't know why the Bengals would sign him.
Recommended Posts