February 4, 201016 yr The point is you guys have been brainwashed into believing a conference title game is anything more than a cash grab. The ACC has one that draws about 50 people. Big deal. If the Big 11 steals Pitt to go that route, so be it. The Big East will add a program capable of replacing them and be just fine... You have got to be kidding me. The Big 12 title game has been great. This year Nebraska came within one second of sending UC to the NC game. Two years ago #1 Mizzou was upset by Oklahoma sending LSU to the NC game. In 2003 K-State upset #1 Oklahoma, 1998 Colorado upset #2 K-State and in the very first one an unranked Texas upset #3 Nebraska. The SEC championship games have been great. Granted the ACC game has left little to be desired, but they do have more than 50 folks that show up. The Big 10 needs a title game as does the PAC-10. And I think the BE does as well.
February 4, 201016 yr Author The point is you guys have been brainwashed into believing a conference title game is anything more than a cash grab. The ACC has one that draws about 50 people. Big deal. If the Big 11 steals Pitt to go that route, so be it. The Big East will add a program capable of replacing them and be just fine... If you really get down to it, how is that different than anything else that goes on in any sport?
February 4, 201016 yr Pitt is one of the top 2-3 programs in the already extremely weak BEast. If they lose them, whoever they get as a replacement will be a step down, and only make the conference that much weaker IMO.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.