December 8, 200916 yr He won a lot of games last year.I suspect most GMs are paying more attention to the 4.67 ERA and 11 hits allowed per nine innings. Until Lowe turns it around, the Braves are stuck with his contract unless they eat a big chunk of it.
December 8, 200916 yr I suspect most GMs are paying more attention to the 4.67 ERA and 11 hits allowed per nine innings. Until Lowe turns it around, the Braves are stuck with his contract unless they eat a big chunk of it. I think the "strong interest from other teams" says otherwise. They aren't going to trade him if they have to eat most of his contract. The whole point of trading him would be to either gain a big bat, or lose his contract to sign a big bat.
December 8, 200916 yr I think the "strong interest from other teams" says otherwise.Gee, one guy (probably a Braves hack) writes it or tweets it and it's gospel. Use common sense. After Lowe's subpar season and his contract, who is going to give up a great deal for him.
December 8, 200916 yr Author The interestcoming for Lowe is because he is durable and can pitch a lot of innings. He ha a subpar season but still fared okay. Most teams that have interest are in on him because he will be a much cheaper option than John Lackey.
December 8, 200916 yr The interestcoming for Lowe is because he is durable and can pitch a lot of innings. He ha a subpar season but still fared okay. Most teams that have interest are in on him because he will be a much cheaper option than John Lackey.Where are you getting this stuff? Lowe is owed $45 million over the next three years. He ain't much cheaper than anyone.
December 8, 200916 yr Gee, one guy (probably a Braves hack) writes it or tweets it and it's gospel. Use common sense. After Lowe's subpar season and his contract, who is going to give up a great deal for him. And I should believe you over a "Braves hack"? Someone will trade for Lowe, I'd almost guarantee it.
December 8, 200916 yr But the Braves remain confident that they'll be able to deal Lowe, and part of their reasoning is based on the fact that his history provides reason to argue he could be every bit as attractive as Lackey, who stands as this year's top free-agent starting pitcher. Some clubs have provided indication that they share this opinion. One American League scout told a Braves scout Sunday night that because of the small dimensions at his club's ballpark, they have interest in Lowe, who induced the third-most ground balls (389) in the National League this past season. Without providing specifics, the Braves contend that multiple clubs have continued to show interest in the possibility of dealing for Lowe. LINK
December 8, 200916 yr And I should believe you over a "Braves hack"?I'm making more sense. You're buying the Braves' spin. Someone will trade for Lowe, I'd almost guarantee it.Not anything of value, unless the Braves eat a chunk of the contract. Or they will take on someone else's bad contract.
December 8, 200916 yr Lowe is looking more and more attractive to teams each day IMO. I mean, Randy Wolf just got offered 3 yr 30 mil by the Brewers. Randy Wolf...10 mil a year...
December 8, 200916 yr Lowe is looking more and more attractive to teams each day IMO. I mean, Randy Wolf just got offered 3 yr 30 mil by the Brewers. Randy Wolf...10 mil a year...Wolf had a much better year, too, and the Brewers are desperate for pitching. Actually, compare Wolf's 2009 season with the Dodgers with Lowe's 2008 campaign there. The numbers (IP, ERA, other stats) are pretty similar. Edited December 8, 200916 yr by westsider
December 8, 200916 yr I don't understand why teams continue to give the Yankee$ big stars, and getting minimal in return. I have almost zero interest in baseball anymore.
December 8, 200916 yr I don't understand why teams continue to give the Yankee$ big stars, and getting minimal in return. I have almost zero interest in baseball anymore.The Tigers are trying to cut payroll, and Granderson has a lot of trouble with left-handed pitching. Minimal return? A lot of people are high on Jackson and Kennedy (not necessarily me), so we'll see.
December 8, 200916 yr The Tigers are trying to cut payroll, and Granderson has a lot of trouble with left-handed pitching. Minimal return? A lot of people are high on Jackson and Kennedy (not necessarily me), so we'll see. Jackson did not play for the Yanks, and Kennedy is ok at best.
December 8, 200916 yr Braves spin ... Perhaps. We'll find out soon enough if the Braves can trade him.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.