November 2, 200916 yr Faried is a good one but he can't hold down the entire UK front court. And Bledsoe will more than take care of the PG spot.
November 2, 200916 yr Faried is a good one but he can't hold down the entire UK front court. And Bledsoe will more than take care of the PG spot. True, and Coach Cal is saying that Miller will play some point and may even start at PG.
November 3, 200916 yr I mentioned this earlier in the thread, but nobody has addressed it. Why can't Wall just sit out both exhibition games? Has the NCAA always distinguished between exhibition & regular season games? I'm guessing that there must be a rule stating that, if a player is suspended, no more than 1 game may be served before the regular season starts. I can't recall if that's how the Randolph Morris situation was handled or not. Anyone?
November 3, 200916 yr Author I mentioned this earlier in the thread, but nobody has addressed it. Why can't Wall just sit out both exhibition games? Has the NCAA always distinguished between exhibition & regular season games? I'm guessing that there must be a rule stating that, if a player is suspended, no more than 1 game may be served before the regular season starts. I can't recall if that's how the Randolph Morris situation was handled or not. Anyone? I can't recall exhibition games ever being a part of the equation, so that one is very new to me. I'm hearing the ruling on Lance will come before the UC exhibition opener and will include both games as well as the season opener...
November 3, 200916 yr I can't recall exhibition games ever being a part of the equation, so that one is very new to me. I'm hearing the ruling on Lance will come before the UC exhibition opener and will include both games as well as the season opener... I always remember kids being able to play in the exhibition games and sitting out the first 2 or 3 "real" games. Must be a new rule now.
November 3, 200916 yr I can't recall exhibition games ever being a part of the equation, so that one is very new to me. I'm hearing the ruling on Lance will come before the UC exhibition opener and will include both games as well as the season opener... I think that'd be a fair ruling for UC & Lance. Sitting out 1 game is not much of a punishment at all. As I've said all along, I just hope they make a decision. If they do not make a decision before the games & Cronin holds him out, I think the NCAA should be forced to count that game towards his suspension. Assuming that there was no "bad faith" in intentionally delaying the process on the part of the player / school.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.