Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Denver is now 5-0.

 

Winning vs New England, Denver may be the top team in the AFC, but the Colts are #1 then Denver maybe just only because they are 5-0. :lol:

Edited by bigblueinsanity
fixed game place
Posted
Denver is now 5-0.

 

Winning at New England, Denver may be the top team in the AFC, but the Colts are #1 then Denver maybe just only because they are 5-0. :lol:

 

The game was at Denver...

Posted

Maybe this McDaniel character knows what he is doing. This summer I thought the Broncos were a trainwreck waiting to happen.

Posted

I still think Denver isn't very good. Yes, Orton is solid and "manages" the game. Their O line is solid and their D is solid. But New England isn't the old New England, Dallas is way overrated. Denver will lose it's next three games. SD, Balt, Pitt I think they have.

Posted

No way Denver loses their next 3 games. They are for real, and all that work that McDaniels put into the team during the summer is slowly starting to payoff. Everyone that he was crazy and that the team would bust but they are for real my friend.

 

They will more than likely beat San Diego, Baltimore will be a close game but I think if the Bengals can win then so can Denver, and Pitt could go either way.

 

 

But I do find it funny how some people say that Denver is such a bad team when the Bengals are playing above themselves as well, but no one is saying anything about them.

Posted

^ Have you watched the Bengals game at all? They haven't even come close to putting a whole game together let alone "playing above themselves". Not sure what the Bengals have to do with this thread but I thought I would respond.

Posted
No way Denver loses their next 3 games. They are for real, and all that work that McDaniels put into the team during the summer is slowly starting to payoff. Everyone that he was crazy and that the team would bust but they are for real my friend.

 

They will more than likely beat San Diego, Baltimore will be a close game but I think if the Bengals can win then so can Denver, and Pitt could go either way.

 

 

But I do find it funny how some people say that Denver is such a bad team when the Bengals are playing above themselves as well, but no one is saying anything about them.

 

You can't be serious.:lol:

Posted
^ Have you watched the Bengals game at all? They haven't even come close to putting a whole game together let alone "playing above themselves". Not sure what the Bengals have to do with this thread but I thought I would respond.

 

What I'm saying is some people are going based off records. I've heard people talking about whether or not the Bengals are "contenders" solely based on them being 4-1. Not based on how they've actually played during the game and everything else.

 

Denver, on the other hand, has played quite well and who cares who they've played, it's an NFL team that has NFL players on it and they took care of business. I may be wrong but I thought good teams were supposed to beat the bad teams? Bronco's are 5-0 and well deserving based on how they've played thus far into the season.

Posted
What I'm saying is some people are going based off records. I've heard people talking about whether or not the Bengals are "contenders" solely based on them being 4-1. Not based on how they've actually played during the game and everything else.

 

Denver, on the other hand, has played quite well and who cares who they've played, it's an NFL team that has NFL players on it and they took care of business. I may be wrong but I thought good teams were supposed to beat the bad teams? Bronco's are 5-0 and well deserving based on how they've played thus far into the season.

Outside of maybe the P&R forum, has there ever been a more contradictory two paragraphs in BGP history???

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using the site you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Policies.