He looks down...but the replay doesn't allow us to see the ball

If they have the same angle, they can't justifiably say that it's not a fumble.

I think he was down, but I don't think it's conclusive. But I won't be surprised if it is overturned.

No!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Unbelievable!!!

He very well may have been down, but they shouldn't have overturned it

You have to be kidding me, another reason to hate the BIG 10

See, that's just poor officiating. There's no way that was conclusive.

You cant "I think" he had possion and overturn that fumble!

 

Exactly. That's GARBAGE. WOW I'm TICKED NOW. GARBAGE.:madman:

Unreal

Big play for a sack though...lets pound him now.

Big third down here still....

"Let them play it out" - If that was the argument, didn't they just play it out? It's not like they called pass interference.

There was absolutely NOTHING conclusive there!

Figures...