July 17, 200818 yr Author No. You made the statement that "we know why he used the words that he did," meaning that he was pandering to his audience. McCain did, too.Totally different IMO. This wasn't just pandering, this was calling ICE terrorists.
July 17, 200818 yr Totally different IMO. This wasn't just pandering, this was calling ICE terrorists. Absolutely correct. Pandering to one group does not require demonizing another.
July 18, 200818 yr Totally different IMO. This wasn't just pandering, this was calling ICE terrorists. If you are equating "terrorist" with the meaning given after 9/11, then no, I don't believe that was the intent.
July 18, 200818 yr Oh, I've had police dogs released on me when I was young (long story, I'm NOT a criminal :lol:), also had an officer point his gun at me, turned out to be my cousin (another long story). Was I scared? Yes. Terrorized? Not so much. RTS, I don't see very many people ever terrorizing you.
July 18, 200818 yr Author If you are equating "terrorist" with the meaning given after 9/11, then no, I don't believe that was the intent.I don't know, TB&G. With this guy, you just can't be sure what he's thinking. Then again, he'll change his mind on it as soon as it's convenient.
July 18, 200818 yr Author RTS, I don't see very many people ever terrorizing you.:lol: If you could meet my dad, you'd understand. :lol:
July 18, 200818 yr RTS, I don't see very many people ever terrorizing you. Squirrels yes. People, no.
July 18, 200818 yr Author Squirrels yes. People, no. You're thinking of Birdsfan. I've been know to "terrorize" a squirrel or two. :fire:
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.