Al Gore is the "face" of the global warming effort, but he is in no way the only person who believes there is an issue with environmental concerns, and global warming. There are scores of very learned scientists with hard data, and observational enviornmantal documents detailing the evidence in reality.

 

There are those to whom this is an apparent non-issue. However, there are those who are forward-thinking, who are looking to the future of the planet generations ahead.

 

I don't just "want" to agree with him. I've researched the evidence. There is a problem.

There are scores of very learned scientists with hard data, and observational environmental documents refuting it.

 

Buying into the hype doesn't make one forward-thinking.

 

I've researched it myself, I've found no such clear evidence that there is a problem.

I disagree with your disagreement. The guy damaged himself by not being able to face defeat when he ran, acted like a child.

Explain ...

Explain ...

:lol:

 

Do I really need to? He just wouldn't give into the fact he lost. Remember the whole Supreme Court thing?

There are scores of very learned scientists with hard data, and observational environmental documents refuting it.

 

Buying into the hype doesn't make one forward-thinking.

 

I've researched it myself, I've found no such clear evidence that there is a problem.

 

 

I've been concerned about environmental issues for the last 30 years. I don't think you could consider me as "buying into the hype".

 

 

You can't look at just the statistics in this one RTS. You have to look at the expeditional reports and data. Years of discovery evidence.

Explain ...

I think he means what took place in the courts after election day.

Let's not get off on a global change tangent.

I've been concerned about environmental issues for the last 30 years. I don't think you could consider me as "buying into the hype".

 

 

You can't look at just the statistics in this one RTS. You have to look at the expeditional reports and data. Years of discovery evidence.

I have. I'll save my augments for another thread, it's been a while since we've had a good global warming debate. I'll take HHSDad's advice and stop here on this issue.

I think he means what took place in the courts after election day.

:thumb:

:lol:

 

Do I really need to? He just wouldn't give into the fact he lost. Remember the whole Supreme Court thing?

The election was worth challenging, although he had a lot of things working against him.

 

However, didn't the Miami Herald report that Gore may have very well won a recount?

 

Personally, I'm not sure we'll never know who won Florida.

The election was worth challenging, although he had a lot of things working against him.

 

However, didn't the Miami Herald report that Gore may have very well won a recount?

 

Personally, I'm not sure we'll never know who won Florida.

Every time they counted, Bush gained more votes. Gore just couldn't face that he lost, he looked foolish.

Gore just couldn't face that he lost, he looked foolish.

Your opinion.

 

Would he ever look any differently in your eyes?

Your opinion.

 

Would he ever look any differently in your eyes?

I'm just being honest. Sorry if it strikes a nerve.

I'm just being honest. Sorry if it strikes a nerve.

I'm sure you are, but rest assured, it doesn't. Par for the course ...

I'm sure you are, but rest assured, it doesn't. Par for the course ...

What is?

Every time they counted, Bush gained more votes. Gore just couldn't face that he lost, he looked foolish.

Florida law mandated a recount. The Bush legal team was the one that filed suit more often, including to the US Supreme Court.