February 17, 200818 yr I have one. It just doesn't happen to be your model. It should, at the very least, be based on something factual. So, give me some facts.
February 17, 200818 yr I think semi-automatic weapons should be banned.Examples of semi-automatic weapons are the semi-auto pistols used by many civilians, and many hunting rifles, both small and large caliber. Other uses include target competition, silhouette shooting, practical pistol competition, etc.
February 17, 200818 yr It should, at the very least, be based on something factual. So, give me some facts.Any weapoon that shoots more than one bullet with a trigger pull. Any weapon that can shoot through steel. Any weapon that can render a cop's vest totally useless. There is no justifiable purpose for anyone to own such guns. I don't mind guns necessary for hunting or target shooting. But these other guns belong in the hands of the military only.
February 17, 200818 yr Any weapoon that shoots more than one bullet with a trigger pull. Any weapon that can shoot through steel. Any weapon that can render a cop's vest totally useless. There is no justifiable purpose for anyone to own such guns. I don't mind guns necessary for hunting or target shooting. But these other guns belong in the hands of the military only. Considered an assault weapon in MANY cases under the ban. See how ridiculous? Name the guns for me that the public own that shoot through steel. Shooting through a cop's vest would be using BANNED rounds.
February 17, 200818 yr I think semi-automatic weapons should be banned. Oh good Lord. So all hunting riffles should be baned. Why? The silence is deafening.
February 17, 200818 yr Considered an assault weapon in MANY cases under the ban.You saying they shouldn't be? :eek:
February 17, 200818 yr You saying they shouldn't be? :eek:Semi-automatic, absolutley NOT! I thought in your own definition you were saying as much. I see the confusion, I misquoted. I meant that many weapons that fire once for each pull of the trigger are considered assault weapons under the ban.
February 17, 200818 yr Author Considered an assault weapon in MANY cases under the ban. See how ridiculous? Name the guns for me that the public own that shoot through steel. Shooting through a cop's vest would be using BANNED rounds. Beating a dead horse here?? I'm surprised you gave any definitions ! For I as well have been waiting for the "anti's" to define for us.
February 17, 200818 yr Semi-automatic, absolutley NOT! I thought in your own definition you were saying as much.I said, any gun that shoots more than one bullet without having to squeeze the trigger again.
February 17, 200818 yr I said, any gun that shoots more than one bullet without having to squeeze the trigger again. I see the confusion, I misquoted. I meant that many weapons that fire once for each pull of the trigger are considered assault weapons under the ban.I straightened out the confusion.
February 17, 200818 yr Beating a dead horse here?? I'm surprised you gave any definitions ! For I as well have been waiting for the "anti's" to define for us.I knew they wouldn't be able to. They are too adapted to the fear mongering.
February 17, 200818 yr Author I knew they wouldn't be able to. They are too adapted to the fear mongering. :thumb::thumb::thumb::thumb:
February 17, 200818 yr I knew they wouldn't be able to. They are too adapted to the fear mongering. Baloney! You're just too tied to your propaganda. Instead of offering solutions, you just keep asking for pointless details. Throwing out pointless questions is a great strategy when you have no answers of your own. :thumb:
February 17, 200818 yr Author Baloney! You're just too tied to your propaganda. Instead of offering solutions, you just keep asking for pointless details. Throwing out pointless questions is a great strategy when you have no answers of your own. :thumb: I am just able to understand that insanity cannot be reasoned with! Those that use arms in the wrong way are crazy.:ylsuper:
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.