September 24, 200719 yr "Usually you go to these sites to pay your respects. And also to perhaps air your views about the root causes of such incidents," Ahmadinejad told the network. I think the second part of his statement to "60 Minutes" is what we could have expected had he been allowed to visit the site.
September 24, 200719 yr In related news, Osama Bin Laden will be appearing on the Tonight Show tonight...
September 24, 200719 yr What specific security reason was it, that his request was rejected? There were Iranians killed on 9/11 at the WTC as well.... It doesn't have to be a security reason . . . he simply doesn't need to be there. He is going simply to promote his agenda. It is sickening.
September 24, 200719 yr Why? The guy is a terrorist for goodness sake . . . we owe him nothing!:madman:
September 25, 200719 yr He tried to do that at Columbia University . Thank God That the president there gave him the respect that he deserved . NONE !!!
September 25, 200719 yr He tried to do that at Columbia University . Thank God That the president there gave him the respect that he deserved . NONE !!! As far as Ahmadinejad is concerned, the president of Columbia was a useful idiot. http://www2.irna.ir/en/news/view/line-24/0709252616013529.htm
September 25, 200719 yr As far as Ahmadinejad is concerned, the president of Columbia was a useful idiot. http://www2.irna.ir/en/news/view/line-24/0709252616013529.htm That may be how Ahmadinejad feels but the feeling I got from what took place was the Columbia president let him have it in a public forum and showed what a blithering idiot Ahmadinejad really is. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20942057/ I think the free thinking world was shown that you handle a sniviling tyrant by exposing his lunacy to free thinking people. Those who believed in the Iranian President are the brainwashed masses now. Those that actually heard Columbia's president take him to task and heard the responses see what a moron the Iranian leader really is.
September 25, 200719 yr I'm sure that the friends of Columbia's president are giving him congratulatory handshakes for speaking "truth to power" and letting the Iranian president "have it". But Ahmadinejad was able to get what he really wanted from this encounter. He has audio and video of himself at a prestigeous US university that he'll be able to edit and spin as he sees fit to the Iranian people. He even has video of himself being applauded by the students. Strengthening his support among his own people is infinitely more important to him than how he is viewed in the US. As far as showing people who Ahmadinejad really is, perhaps there is some marginal benefit that some people who haven't paid much attention to the Iranian president will take notice. Certainly the statement that there are no homosexuals in Iran will get noticed. However, anybody who has been paying attention to Ahmadinejad and Iran already knew that they execute homosexuals in Iran. Certainly, any informed individual with even a gram of common sense didn't need Ahmadinejad to speak at Columbia to form an objective opinion of him. The bottom line is that Ahmadinejad benefited more from this encounter than either Columbia or the American people.
September 25, 200719 yr I'm sure that the friends of Columbia's president are giving him congratulatory handshakes for speaking "truth to power" and letting the Iranian president "have it". But Ahmadinejad was able to get what he really wanted from this encounter. He has audio and video of himself at a prestigeous US university that he'll be able to edit and spin as he sees fit to the Iranian people. He even has video of himself being applauded by the students. Strengthening his support among his own people is infinitely more important to him than how he is viewed in the US. As far as showing people who Ahmadinejad really is, perhaps there is some marginal benefit that some people who haven't paid much attention to the Iranian president will take notice. Certainly the statement that there are no homosexuals in Iran will get noticed. However, anybody who has been paying attention to Ahmadinejad and Iran already knew that they execute homosexuals in Iran. Certainly, any informed individual with even a gram of common sense didn't need Ahmadinejad to speak at Columbia to form an objective opinion of him. The bottom line is that Ahmadinejad benefited more from this encounter than either Columbia or the American people. To be honest it would not have mattered if he had spoken or not. Spin happens for him irregardless and there was nothing he did or did not say that wasn't going to convince the "masses of Iran." I'm not sure that invite was a good idea but I think the Columbia President surprised me as well as him with his intro. In the end if you want to make a statement, anyone can. I just don't think it's worth calling the Columbia President an idiot over when I think he did a good job of "turning the tables" and catching Ahmadinejad off guard to say the least. I think the US was greatly served because people see him in a light that lets you know this is no ordinary national leader but a clear kook that is hard to trust when he has said so many stupid things. Convincing middle America of that is worth much more than any points he scores with the brainwashed masses in Iran.
September 25, 200719 yr It is pathetic that this man was allowed on U.S. soil. Yes, the Columbia president tried to turn it into a roast, but why was this guy here in the first place? Asking if he could "pay his respects to the victims of 9/11" is the ultimate kick in the solar flexes to the American people, IMO.
September 25, 200719 yr The guy is a terrorist for goodness sake . . . we owe him nothing!:madman: But you said this would be a good time to strike Iran. I don't follow.
September 25, 200719 yr It is pathetic that this man was allowed on U.S. soil. Yes, the Columbia president tried to turn it into a roast, but why was this guy here in the first place? Asking if he could "pay his respects to the victims of 9/11" is the ultimate kick in the solar flexes to the American people, IMO. The only reason he was allowed to come was the UN.
September 25, 200719 yr But you said this would be a good time to strike Iran. I don't follow. Huh? You must have read that somewhere else. I don't recall posting such. In fact, I think it was THEGREENDANDY that actually posted that comment.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.