March 23, 200719 yr There should be at least a second run off. He kept it in bounds and the clock doesn't stop until it touches..... You're cheating somehow:thumb:
March 23, 200719 yr There should be at least a second run off. He kept it in bounds and the clock doesn't stop until it touches..... It should have stopped when it hit Calipari, no way that much time should have been taken off, IMO.
March 23, 200719 yr It should have stopped when it hit Calipari, no way that much time should have been taken off, IMO. And you are wrong. Watch it at full speed and it was AT LEAST a second. Likely more...
March 23, 200719 yr Wow, officials swallowed the oyster at the end of this one Nope. They were right both times...
March 23, 200719 yr Nope. They were right both times... You know that tick tack foul rarely gets called in that situation. That fact is debated here all the time.
March 23, 200719 yr There should be at least a second run off. He kept it in bounds and the clock doesn't stop until it touches..... I agree. Its not OOB when its over the sideline. It has to touch something. Now, if I'm A&M, I argue that the official blew his whistle before it touched OOB and, thus, 1.1 should not have been taken off the clock.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.