March 18, 200719 yr ^ You are right, has to be Duke. Lost four in a row and 7 out of 11, losing record in the ACC counting tourney and they get a 6 seed? What a bunch of crap.
March 18, 200719 yr The Committee did a good job on the seeding this year, it may not be perfect, it never is. I see Duke as a bring a 7th seed and Indiana a 9th seed were the only ones I would change. UK's 8th was fair,we all wanted them to get a 7 or even a 10 seed, just to keep they from playing a 1 seed in the 2nd round,but giving away that game to Miss St. I think cost them that 7th seed.But all in all the seeding was as good this year as I can recall.
March 18, 200719 yr I know they have a tough job but it was so obvious that they overseeded Duke as they do more often than not, based on Duke's record in the tourny compared to their seeding the last four or five years.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.