On 11/9/2024 at 4:04 PM, 16thBBall Fan said:

We haven’t really said much about Zac passing on the 57 yd FG, obviously would’ve been a huge 3 pts, why did we give him all that money if it wasn’t for that situation??

As seen in the post just above this one, the Bengals need more points because of their defense. I think the Bengals are going to be a more aggressive go for it on 4th down team like the Ravens game. Go for 7 points over the field goal every time it is reasonable. The Bengals don't trust their defense - and rightfully so. 

11 hours ago, Tranquility Base said:

Again, this isn't a Zac Taylor problem. This is Lou Anarumo/Defense problem.  Massive changes need to happen, but not Zac or the offense (other than needing to ink Chase long term)

I don’t understand why they’re diddling around with his contract. 

On 11/12/2024 at 9:10 AM, mcpapa said:

I don’t understand why they’re diddling around with his contract. 

They cost themselves money by waiting on the Chase contract.

2 hours ago, Voice of Reason said:

They cost themselves money by waiting on the Chase contract.

Same thing the Cowboys have been doing.