Mack The Knife Posted January 23, 2007 Share Posted January 23, 2007 Just wondering, Would Owen or Gallatin have any wins this year without Daniel or Nate? Do you mean 0 for the season?:confused: Can't speak for Owen, but the current group of Wildcats minus point guard Justin Davis went 19-10 last year and won the All 'A' Region and the 31st District. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buttels Posted January 23, 2007 Share Posted January 23, 2007 Do you mean 0 for the season?:confused: Can't speak for Owen, but the current group of Wildcats minus point guard Justin Davis went 19-10 last year and won the All 'A' Region and the 31st District. With Owen losing Kermicle, Toole, Buchanan. I would have to say that Owen would be on the short side of things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mack The Knife Posted January 23, 2007 Share Posted January 23, 2007 With Owen losing Kermicle, Toole, Buchanan. I would have to say that Owen would be on the short side of things. Also Sutherland. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teammomaholic Posted January 23, 2007 Share Posted January 23, 2007 Do you mean 0 for the season?:confused: Can't speak for Owen, but the current group of Wildcats minus point guard Justin Davis went 19-10 last year and won the All 'A' Region and the 31st District. And the Conference!:thumb: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexander93 Posted January 23, 2007 Share Posted January 23, 2007 What time is the championship game Sat. night? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
funtowatch Posted January 23, 2007 Author Share Posted January 23, 2007 7:00 The question is who do you think will be playing and who will win? The big three are Walton, Owen, and Gallatin, but Eminence has been playing better and come tourney I don't count anyone out. All the named players aside if it comes down to the best "team" Gallatin has to be the team to watch. Owen and Walton should see each other in the second round. The two Sophomores for Gallatin can at times take over a game. Giles and Brown always give them the defensive energy they need. T. Jones can lite you up and play a solid floor game. Perkins will quietly score 15 grab 8 rebounds have 6 assist and 4 steals and you will never hear his name unless you are in the apposing teams huddles. This is without talking about Davis or Hensen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sticks02 Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 A team wins championships, not one player i totaly agree with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
funtowatch Posted January 24, 2007 Author Share Posted January 24, 2007 i totaly agree with you. me too:ylsuper: and the best team is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
True blue (and gold) Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 i totaly agree with you. Welcome to the site, Sticks02! :ylsuper: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MysteriousOnes Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 7:00 The question is who do you think will be playing and who will win? The big three are Walton, Owen, and Gallatin, but Eminence has been playing better and come tourney I don't count anyone out. All the named players aside if it comes down to the best "team" Gallatin has to be the team to watch. Owen and Walton should see each other in the second round. The two Sophomores for Gallatin can at times take over a game. Giles and Brown always give them the defensive energy they need. T. Jones can lite you up and play a solid floor game. Perkins will quietly score 15 grab 8 rebounds have 6 assist and 4 steals and you will never hear his name unless you are in the apposing teams huddles. This is without talking about Davis or Hensen. Your talking about key players for Gallatin and Nate Edmonson is not mentioned once? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
funtowatch Posted January 24, 2007 Author Share Posted January 24, 2007 Your talking about key players for Gallatin and Nate Edmonson is not mentioned once? All the named players ...was referring to Edmondson and Neeley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
04sportsfan05 Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 Since the Wildcats were already 5 or 6 and 2 before having Nate, I would say they would have won some games. They still have alot of talent. As for Owen...I think that is a different story. Neeley is their team. He passes, shoots, everything. They wouldve still won some, but i think they would have been bottom of the 31st. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
funtowatch Posted January 24, 2007 Author Share Posted January 24, 2007 Since the Wildcats were already 5 or 6 and 2 before having Nate, I would say they would have won some games. They still have alot of talent. As for Owen...I think that is a different story. Neeley is their team. He passes, shoots, everything. They wouldve still won some, but i think they would have been bottom of the 31st. I think Daniel does mean more to Owen than Nate does to Gallatin but the way Carroll has played I wouldn't put them at the bottom and had he not been there some of the other players probably would have stepped up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
happie pappie Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 7:00 The question is who do you think will be playing and who will win? The big three are Walton, Owen, and Gallatin, but Eminence has been playing better and come tourney I don't count anyone out. All the named players aside if it comes down to the best "team" Gallatin has to be the team to watch. Owen and Walton should see each other in the second round. The two Sophomores for Gallatin can at times take over a game. Giles and Brown always give them the defensive energy they need. T. Jones can lite you up and play a solid floor game. Perkins will quietly score 15 grab 8 rebounds have 6 assist and 4 steals and you will never hear his name unless you are in the apposing teams huddles. This is without talking about Davis or Hensen. Who do you think will be there and why? Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoJoKo Posted January 24, 2007 Share Posted January 24, 2007 With Owen losing Kermicle, Toole, Buchanan. I would have to say that Owen would be on the short side of things. Buchanan?? That kid is only a junior this year. You might have meant smith?? And with not many of these kids playing much varsity last year i think we need to give Owen some credit, seeing as how they have almost have a new starting 5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts