1 minute ago, John Anthony said:

The big differences anymore are for the gamers who still use TV’s to game on.  The casual guy watching the game will never really notice a difference on any 4K TV.

I agree gaming is a separate category.

When it comes to TVs, I believe they nearly all have superior technology to the "signals" coming into them.  I am painting with a broad brush but my point is all the bells and whistles in the world don't matter when the incoming signal is a couple of fries short of a happy meal.  

2 hours ago, John Anthony said:

The big differences anymore are for the gamers who still use TV’s to game on.  The casual guy watching the game will never really notice a difference on any 4K TV.

I am not a gamer, so that doesn't matter to me.   My kids game, but they aren't into it so hardcore that they would notice things like that.

1 hour ago, theguru said:

I agree gaming is a separate category.

When it comes to TVs, I believe they nearly all have superior technology to the "signals" coming into them.  I am painting with a broad brush but my point is all the bells and whistles in the world don't matter when the incoming signal is a couple of fries short of a happy meal.  

Compress it enough so you can get 500 channels instead of 50, then blow it up onto a 75 or 85" screen and you are bound to lose something in the transfer.

1 minute ago, The Raven said:

Compress it enough so you can get 500 channels instead of 50, then blow it up onto a 75 or 85" screen and you are bound to lose something in the transfer.

Captain, we need more bandwidth! 

I have a 65” Samsung downstairs and a 55” LG upstairs. I can’t tell any difference between them. For comparison sake, I have a cheap 42” RCA outside on my deck that I’m perfectly happy with. As long as you’re at least 1080 resolution, I don’t think you can go wrong. It’s just a question of how many bells and whistles you want. 

We've only had Samsung & Sony.  No complaints with either.