Trinity ended up having a solid year

Three points in 2nd quarter doomed them tonight.

Ballard with too much talent!

Sisk kid will be  a major talent

Rocks never showed up tonight.

Really disappointed.

9 minutes ago, loubballfan said:

Trinity ended up having a solid year

Three points in 2nd quarter doomed them tonight.

Ballard with too much talent!

Sisk kid will be  a major talent

I agree about Sisk kid. He’s a baller and only a sophomore.

Congrats to Ballard.    I have no complaints about T's season.    As a matter of fact,  they overachieved a bit IMO.

42 minutes ago, Tigerpride94 said:

I agree about Sisk kid. He’s a baller and only a sophomore.

Don't forget they lost his running mate, Jack Edelen, for the season.     Ballard should loaded next year.

16 minutes ago, tcjkbt said:

Don't forget they lost his running mate, Jack Edelen, for the season.     Ballard should loaded next year.

Right. Definitely will be the team to beat.

I’d hold off on predictions for next year. The possibility for “5th years”  to come back could change the landscape for some schools. 

1 hour ago, Tigerpride94 said:

I agree about Sisk kid. He’s a baller and only a sophomore.

That class was celebrated even last year, as freshmen.  And though he wasn’t as heralded as the others, I wondered if Sisk might end up being the best college prospect.  Several of the others in that group are in the 5’9 to 6’ range, including his teammate Edelen.  And at that height you can certainly be a great high school player, but you don’t find many D1 players.  The kid at Male (Glenn) is clearly very talented, but he’s 6’6 and to this point almost exclusively an inside player.  (Well, I haven’t seen him this year, maybe he’s advanced.). Sisk was 6’3 at the time, and I think he’s listed at 6’5 now, is long and plays guard.  He may not be as good in high school, but I’m eager to see where he is in 4 years time.

3 minutes ago, Mojocat said:

That class was celebrated even last year, as freshmen.  And though he wasn’t as heralded as the others, I wondered if Sisk might end up being the best college prospect.  Several of the others in that group are in the 5’9 to 6’ range, including his teammate Edelen.  And at that height you can certainly be a great high school player, but you don’t find many D1 players.  The kid at Male (Glenn) is clearly very talented, but he’s 6’6 and to this point almost exclusively an inside player.  (Well, I haven’t seen him this year, maybe he’s advanced.). Sisk was 6’3 at the time, and I think he’s listed at 6’5 now, is long and plays guard.  He may not be as good in high school, but I’m eager to see where he is in 4 years time.

Glenn hit 4 of 5 threes against St. X and shot 46% from 3 on season so he has some outside game as well.

9 hours ago, tcjkbt said:

Congrats to Ballard.    I have no complaints about T's season.    As a matter of fact,  they overachieved a bit IMO.

I can't disagree.  No offense to kids on team but there are no players close to the Josh Sewell, Ray Spaulding, Jay Scrubb or David Johnson level. 

2012 team had 3-4 D1 level kids, 2015 had 4-5 and 2018 had at least three.

Hard to win in the 7th region without that level players.

11 hours ago, Tigerpride94 said:

Glenn hit 4 of 5 threes against St. X and shot 46% from 3 on season so he has some outside game as well.

Thanks for that.  Good to know - answers a lot of questions I had about him......