I have no problem if Trump is guilty that he goes down. I have a big problem if the Clinton's and Podesta don't go down with him. They are just as guilty and we know more about their collusions with the Ruskies.

How did this thread slip into discussion about Hillary?

 

Hasn't @Jesse James created his 4000 Hillary thread recently? :lol2:

Surely Hillary could be bashed in it.

 

Nunes has a responsibility to operate independently of the WH. How can we trust him to complete a thorough and just investigation with the games he is playing?

 

Republicans will need to do this right or they will suffer in 2018 and 2020 at the hands of other Republicans, Independents, and Democrats.

How did this thread slip into discussion about Hillary?

 

Hasn't @Jesse James created his 4000 Hillary thread recently? :lol2:

Surely Hillary could be bashed in it.

 

Nunes has a responsibility to operate independently of the WH. How can we trust him to complete a thorough and just investigation with the games he is playing?

 

Republicans will need to do this right or they will suffer in 2018 and 2020 at the hands of other Republicans, Independents, and Democrats.

 

 

You mean like Harry Reid did when Obama was in office?

You mean like Harry Reid did when Obama was in office?

 

Was Harry Reid investigating the WH?

How did this thread slip into discussion about Hillary?

 

Hasn't @Jesse James created his 4000 Hillary thread recently? :lol2:

Surely Hillary could be bashed in it.

 

 

#Playbook

#Playbook

 

So your opinion is prosecute the conservative and turn a blind eye to the liberal? I would think the scales of justice would be fair on both sides. the conservative is being investigated and many numerous sources from the NSA and so forth have gone on record and said there was no evidence and has been no collusion. Now let's take a look at the liberal candidate who was in the same electoral race who on appearance has way more ties, her, her husband, Podesta and who's own party leader was caught on an open mike saying that " he would have more latitude with them after the election". I'm not Bashing Clinton. I just think you guys should be impartial to who get's investigated for crimes. Unless political expediency gets them a free pass on everything. I believe I and Jesse said if Trump is guilty get him. Where is the cry for all appearances of misdoings from both parties?

So Schiff sees the documents and once again slams the Nunes process. Of course he doesn't say, "there is nothing to this" because there is something to it. So Schiff, A vocal partisan who hates Trump, is considered bipartisan and impartial, but Nunes should step down. That is par for the course.

So your opinion is prosecute the conservative and turn a blind eye to the liberal? I would think the scales of justice would be fair on both sides. the conservative is being investigated and many numerous sources from the NSA and so forth have gone on record and said there was no evidence and has been no collusion. Now let's take a look at the liberal candidate who was in the same electoral race who on appearance has way more ties, her, her husband, Podesta and who's own party leader was caught on an open mike saying that " he would have more latitude with them after the election". I'm not Bashing Clinton. I just think you guys should be impartial to who get's investigated for crimes. Unless political expediency gets them a free pass on everything. I believe I and Jesse said if Trump is guilty get him. Where is the cry for all appearances of misdoings from both parties?

 

 

Your post tells me you didn't get the reference.

Your post tells me you didn't get the reference.

 

Sorry, I don't understand the coded cryptic message. I'm a little literal and straight forward. I learned to use smaller unambiguous words when communicating so that your thoughts and intent is clear. So I obviously have no clue what the post was intended to mean and my perception was off. Care to clarify?

So Schiff sees the documents and once again slams the Nunes process. Of course he doesn't say, "there is nothing to this" because there is something to it. So Schiff, A vocal partisan who hates Trump, is considered bipartisan and impartial, but Nunes should step down. That is par for the course.

 

Agreed.

 

Schiff is as as partisan as they come.

So Schiff sees the documents and once again slams the Nunes process. Of course he doesn't say, "there is nothing to this" because there is something to it. So Schiff, A vocal partisan who hates Trump, is considered bipartisan and impartial, but Nunes should step down. That is par for the course.

 

Agreed.

 

Schiff is as as partisan as they come.

 

So you disagree with Schiff who believes the documents Nunes recieved from the WH should have been shared with the House and Senate Intelligence Committee's?

 

Schiff like the rest of America is questioning Nunes' behavior and impartiality in these matters. If he has evidence of survillence then that evidence should be delineated to those committees who are investigating.

 

Of course I'm not sure how any of this ties in to the Russia/ Trump investigation the committee is investigating unless Trump associates are tied with Russia, and they believe the evidence was obtained illegally.

So you disagree with Schiff who believes the documents Nunes recieved from the WH should have been shared with the House and Senate Intelligence Committee's?

 

Schiff like the rest of America is questioning Nunes' behavior and impartiality in these matters. If he has evidence of survillence then that evidence should be delineated to those committees who are investigating.

 

Of course I'm not sure how any of this ties in to the Russia/ Trump investigation the committee is investigating unless Trump associates are tied with Russia, and they believe the evidence was obtained illegally.

 

They can share all of it. I don't care about that. Nobody want to talk about the substance, they want to criticize the process as a smoke screen. They want Nunes to step down from the Russia investigation. Nunes states these documents have nothing to do with Russia. Explain why he should step down? The Dems are screaming about process to smokescreen the Obama administration's surveillance of Trump and his associates.

They can share all of it. I don't care about that. Nobody want to talk about the substance, they want to criticize the process as a smoke screen. They want Nunes to step down from the Russia investigation. Nunes states these documents have nothing to do with Russia. Explain why he should step down? The Dems are screaming about process to smokescreen the Obama administration's surveillance of Trump and his associates.

Good post. The Dems continue to fully adopt Alinsky tactics.....all symbolism over substance.

They can share all of it. I don't care about that. Nobody want to talk about the substance, they want to criticize the process as a smoke screen. They want Nunes to step down from the Russia investigation. Nunes states these documents have nothing to do with Russia. Explain why he should step down? The Dems are screaming about process to smokescreen the Obama administration's surveillance of Trump and his associates.

 

We don't know the substance of this deflection. Until this week only Nunes knew and Trump staffers, of course.

 

The real substance is collusion with Russia, but 3 weeks ago Trump made a wild accusation of wiretapping to deflect. Since then he's moved the goalposts about a dozen times to keep people away from focusing on the real substance.

We don't know the substance of this deflection. Until this week only Nunes knew and Trump staffers, of course.

 

The real substance is collusion with Russia, but 3 weeks ago Trump made a wild accusation of wiretapping to deflect. Since then he's moved the goalposts about a dozen times to keep people away from focusing on the real substance.

 

You can't be serious about this Russia collusion thing being the real substance. Obama's director of National Intelligence Clapper said there was no evidence of collusion. Michael Morell, Ex-CIA director and Clinton associate says "smoke, but no fire" on March 15th. They can continue the investigation for 4 years and will probably find nothing.

 

Do you really believe that the Obama administration did not do everything possible to find a link? They couldn't find anything.

 

Why would Clapper and Morell say this? It is far more beneficial for the Democrats for these two guys to say nothing and let the Russia thing continue.

 

The FBI director stated that Putin only helped Donald Trump by hurting Hillary Clinton. Putin also helped Bernie Sanders by hurting Hillary. Putin did not like Hillary.

 

The Russian Collusion story is Democrat obstruction and a smoke screen. The media doesn't like Donald Trump, so they continue writing articles about Russia.

 

It is not illegal to talk to Russians. In addition, the ONLY proven crime is leaking of classified material. These are 2 really unfortunate facts for the Democrats.