January 4, 20179 yr That is my point. I think that is very telling about Dalton as a qb if a team wouldn't be willing to even give up a stud DT for him in a player for player trade. Dalton hasn't really won any big games and doesn't make plays when they matter most in big games. McCarron at least has made plays in the playoff game that should have won it for them. That is why I would try to trade Dalton and the Rams would be the team I call. You may be right they may laugh and say no. But I would at least try. Imo the Bengals have seen what they can do with Dalton and Lewis. They need to at least try something new. It could work or could backfire. Maybe we can trade Green too because that guy hasn't shown up for a big game yet.
January 4, 20179 yr I completely agree. Which I definitely could understand the Rams saying no. Which says a lot about where the Bengals are stuck currently with Dalton. Good enough to win games but not good enough to get over the top. The Bengals are in are bad spot imo, and why I would try to trade Dalton. With the Rams being in LA now and their offense sucking. They could possibly decide to go for it, to at least try to make their offense better and more fun for the new stadium. I would at least make that call if I was the bengals. I swear your logic is like Greek math. Why are the Bengals stuck with Dalton? That's such backwards thinking I can't even understand how you get to that version of logic. So, because the Rams wouldn't trade Donald for him, Dalton hamstrings the Bengals? Holy Cow. It's more apparent than ever if that attitude permeates through Bengal country, you folks are worse off than I thought. Geez
January 4, 20179 yr I swear your logic is like Greek math. Why are the Bengals stuck with Dalton? That's such backwards thinking I can't even understand how you get to that version of logic. So, because the Rams wouldn't trade Donald for him, Dalton hamstrings the Bengals? Holy Cow. It's more apparent than ever if that attitude permeates through Bengal country, you folks are worse off than I thought. Geez They aren't stuck with Dalton, they want Dalton. I agree with them. We have gone to the playoffs 5 of the last 6 years with him as QB. As a Bengals fan for 40+ we have never had a stretch like that. Yes, he needs to win a playoff game, but I will ride with him. It can be MUCH worse, believe me. 1991-2002 geez was that horrible.
January 4, 20179 yr They aren't stuck with Dalton, they want Dalton. I agree with them. We have gone to the playoffs 5 of the last 6 years with him as QB. As a Bengals fan for 40+ we have never had a stretch like that. Yes, he needs to win a playoff game, but I will ride with him. It can be MUCH worse, believe me. 1991-2002 geez was that horrible. I agree with you 100%. Remember I survived the Bubby Brister/Kordell Stewart years. Ugh
January 4, 20179 yr Author I swear your logic is like Greek math. Why are the Bengals stuck with Dalton? That's such backwards thinking I can't even understand how you get to that version of logic. So, because the Rams wouldn't trade Donald for him, Dalton hamstrings the Bengals? Holy Cow. It's more apparent than ever if that attitude permeates through Bengal country, you folks are worse off than I thought. Geez They are stuck with him in terms of he does win enough games that you would basically be foolish to get rid of him. While at the same time he probably will never get them over the hump in being a true super bowl contender. He is the true middle of the road qb to where he is good enough to keep, but not good enough to get where you want. Basically he is good enough to where it would scare people like Bengal Maniac and probably management to move on from him, for fear of being wrong on McCarron.
January 4, 20179 yr Author They aren't stuck with Dalton, they want Dalton. I agree with them. We have gone to the playoffs 5 of the last 6 years with him as QB. As a Bengals fan for 40+ we have never had a stretch like that. Yes, he needs to win a playoff game, but I will ride with him. It can be MUCH worse, believe me. 1991-2002 geez was that horrible. I agree it can be much worst. Shoot I was only 2 when the Bengals made their last super bowl. So I have known the Bengals to be horrible the majority of my life. However I also know sometimes you have to take a risk to change things. I am at that point now where I am willing for them to take that chance on a guy like McCarron. It is scary because there is no guarantee he would do well, because there is only a small sample size with him. I want to see this team be a team that can be a true super bowl contender and I am not sure they can be with Dalton. So I am willing to take that chance. Sometimes in life if you want big rewards, you have to take big risk. I am fully aware it could backfire lol.
January 4, 20179 yr The Bengals have issues that aren't under center. I mean no disrespect at all, but the O line is junk minus Whit. Your best threat out of the backfield ended up on IR. Eifert was a part time guy. You let your best defensive back leave in free agency (look at Reggie's numbers again this season). AJ Green's injury goes without saying. Lots of issues that someone short of Rodgers couldn't have overcome.
January 4, 20179 yr Author Maybe we can trade Green too because that guy hasn't shown up for a big game yet. He did make what should have been the game winning td pass thrown by McCarron. Green also had a chance to make a game winning td catch in the second playoff game against the Texans that would have gave the Bengals a lead with 3 minutes left but Dalton decided to over throw him as he was wide open behind the defense in the end zone.
January 4, 20179 yr Author The Bengals have issues that aren't under center. I mean no disrespect at all, but the O line is junk minus Whit. Your best threat out of the backfield ended up on IR. Eifert was a part time guy. You let your best defensive back leave in free agency (look at Reggie's numbers again this season). AJ Green's injury goes without saying. Lots of issues that someone short of Rodgers couldn't have overcome. I agree it's not all on Dalton. However the fact is Dalton has to have a lot around him be very good for him to be successful. Then even with that when it comes to big games and playoff games, your qb still has to make plays. Even Colin Kapernick when he had the great defense, had to make plays when it counted for those 49er teams to make runs in the playoffs. Dalton even when he has had the pieces around him has struggled to beat good teams, and prime time game and playoff games speak for himself. Sometimes you need your qb to make a play to pick the rest of the team up in big games, and six years in he still hasn't shown the ability to do that.
January 4, 20179 yr I agree it's not all on Dalton. However the fact is Dalton has to have a lot around him be very good for him to be successful. Then even with that when it comes to big games and playoff games, your qb still has to make plays. Even Colin Kapernick when he had the great defense, had to make plays when it counted for those 49er teams to make runs in the playoffs. Dalton even when he has had the pieces around him has struggled to beat good teams, and prime time game and playoff games speak for himself. Sometimes you need your qb to make a play to pick the rest of the team up in big games, and six years in he still hasn't shown the ability to do that.I totally disagree with your premise, and I'm out on this one. You make my head hurt.:idunno:
January 4, 20179 yr AD getting hurt last year was the biggest blow this franchise has had in years. He was having an MVP year, they were headed to a #2 seed, maybe 1. They would have stayed away from the Steelers, which they can't beat when they have to. Then they got real old and let the wrong players get away.
January 4, 20179 yr Author AD getting hurt last year was the biggest blow this franchise has had in years. He was having an MVP year, they were headed to a #2 seed, maybe 1. They would have stayed away from the Steelers, which they can't beat when they have to. Then they got real old and let the wrong players get away. We will never know if we get the two seed with Dalton or not. Dalton never plays well against the Steelers and usually don't score much. Which the defense that day didn't play well. Monday night on the road against the Denver defense would not exactly been a type of environment that Dalton is known to thrive in. Considering Daltons track record against the Steelers and good teams in prime time. We probably lose to the steelers and Broncos with Dalton just like we did with Mccarron. Let's not forget in his 2 games before his injury he played a horrible game against the Texans on Monday night football that they lost and then the same thing against the Cardinals the next week in prime time that they lost. As great of a year he was having, he still struggled in the same games he always had struggled in. So it's hard to say they win either of those 2 games, which they would have needed to win 1 of them for the 2 seed. I agree it would have been nice to see how he would have finished out. However even in his best season he still struggled against good teams and in prime time with losses his last few starts before the injury.
January 4, 20179 yr That is my point. I think that is very telling about Dalton as a qb if a team wouldn't be willing to even give up a stud DT for him in a player for player trade. Dalton hasn't really won any big games and doesn't make plays when they matter most in big games. McCarron at least has made plays in the playoff game that should have won it for them. That is why I would try to trade Dalton and the Rams would be the team I call. You may be right they may laugh and say no. But I would at least try. Imo the Bengals have seen what they can do with Dalton and Lewis. They need to at least try something new. It could work or could backfire. Then you agree they'd be crazy to trade Donald for Dalton?
January 4, 20179 yr Author Dalton has beat the Steelers 3 times in his career and has lost 8 times. His 3 wins were scores of 16 to 10, 13 to 10, and 20 to 10. None of those games did Dalton really play that well. The 16 to 10 win came in 2015. Meaning he only put up 16 points in the win during his best season. The most points Dalton has scored on the Steelers is 21. He has scored 20 twice and the rest in teens or single digits. The second game in 2015 the Steelers scored 31 points. So there is no reason to believe we win with Dalton considering he never scored more than 21 against them. Especially when McCarron put up 20 that day off the bench. In those 3 losses after Dalton got hurt, there was no real reason to say man I wish we had Dalton this day because of a bad performance by McCarron. McCarron scored 20 and 16 against the Steelers, which was very similar to Daltons career numbers against them. Then the Denver game absolutely zero reason to believe Dalton on Monday night football against that defense does much better than what McCarron did against them scoring 17 in an OT lost. We have 6 years of data on Dalton. In 4 games with McCarron we have seen similar numbers and results as Dalton. Except McCarron did it with less experience and honestly in bigger moments. You would think he gets better with more experience. Which is why I would take that risk with him.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.