December 17, 20169 yr Isn't it true that 90% or more of these people "working for Obama" will be the same intelligence people "working for Trump" in about one month? Do they all become trustworthy on January 20?
December 17, 20169 yr Cop out to allow you to only believe what fits an agenda.I am not the one posting articles containing misleading headlines. I did not support either Trump or Hillary, but if I had, I would not have been a sore loser. It is easy to distinguish between those who post with an agenda from those who are merely staying true to their principles.
December 17, 20169 yr Isn't it true that 90% or more of these people "working for Obama" will be the same intelligence people "working for Trump" in about one month? Do they all become trustworthy on January 20? I think come sometime quickly after January 20th there is a come to Jesus meeting with Trump. Lets see what starts coming out after that date. Care to wager that it will be a very different narrative?
December 17, 20169 yr I think come sometime quickly after January 20th there is a come to Jesus meeting with Trump. Lets see what starts coming out after that date. Care to wager that it will be a very different narrative? Why make a losing bet? The narrative has already changed. I lose that bet before it is even made.
December 17, 20169 yr I am guessing there were alot that feared for their jobs if they went against the current narrative.
December 19, 20169 yr Wasn't Georgia's computer holding the vote counts an attempted hack and Kentucky the same thing? Both searches led back to a URL address at the Department of Homeland Security? Both tries unsuccessful. Anyone read about this?
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.