Absolutely. The barrage of "gotcha" stories won't change one half of one half of one half of one percent of voters' minds.

 

And there's always someone out there worth voting for - even if it's a write-in. The two-party system won't change unless enough voters go in another direction.

 

I don't necessarily agree that this is a "gotcha" story. Being that one person is fired and another resigned shortly after its release, I imagine there is some truth to it no matter how much people want to attack the source.

 

With that said, it won't change anyone's mind. Anyone voting for Hillary is clearly ok with the fact that she's a corrupt, lying, careless, terrible person already being that they're voting for her after all the bad things she's done to this point. This isn't any better or worse than the stories out already showing her character.

 

A write in vote would be a waste of time. I'm not naive enough to think that my write in vote would mean anything.

OK, let me make sure I get this. A person who has been convicted and lost civil suits for creating fraudulent videos has now created some videos that I am supposed to believe without question.

Two Democrat operatives lost their jobs over those videos. ACORN was forced to disband and the roaches in that organization were forced to reorganize under new corporate names because of previous O'Keefe videos. It is amazing to see voters continue to support a career criminal-politician who continues to avoid prosecution by corrupting our political system and disparage O'Keefe because of politically motivated prosecutions and lawsuits.

 

Those political operatives boasting about breaking the law on Hillary's behalf were not puppets. They said what the video shows them saying and they are now looking for new jobs. Who is the bigger threat to our justice system, a journalist who bends some rules to expose widespread systematic corruption of our political system, or the corrupt politicians and bureaucrats that he has exposed?

And O'Keefe is the only person convicted of crimes and the only person who had to pay civil penalties as result of his video making activities. Are we supposed to ignore that?

And O'Keefe is the only person convicted of crimes and the only person who had to pay civil penalties as result of his video making activities. Are we supposed to ignore that?

Of course not. Just avoid watching the videos and continue to support Hillary until she is actually convicted of a felony. Until then, she is as pure as the driven snow.

Of course not. Just avoid watching the videos and continue to support Hillary until she is actually convicted of a felony. Until then, she is as pure as the driven snow.

 

And you keep ignoring that the videos are made by a criminal with an agenda. Choose only the facts that make your point and ignore the rest.

And you keep ignoring that the videos are made by a criminal with an agenda. Choose only the facts that make your point and ignore the rest.

 

Only charge I've seen that he was convicted of was single misdemeanor count of entering a federal building under false pretenses. Is there more or is that why you refer to him as a criminal?

If i were a Hillary supporter, not sure I'd be throwing the word criminal around much :lol2:.

And you keep ignoring that the videos are made by a criminal with an agenda. Choose only the facts that make your point and ignore the rest.

Had O'Keefe been a Washington Post reporter, he would have no criminal record. I did not need to see his latest videos to understand how corrupt Hillary Clinton is and has always been.

 

How do you believe O'Keefe managed to make the subjects of those two videos look so guilty of inappropriate behavior that Democrats fired them? What role did O'Keefe's misdemeanor conviction play in their dismissal?

No doubt the Dem contractors said stupid things and they paid the price. I don't trust O'Keefe to put out a legitimate video. He paid a $100,000 fine to an ACORN employee because of his carefully crafted ACORN video. And Watergate was about breaking and entering and the coverup, which is similar to what O'Keefe was convicted of.

 

All that being said, what do these videos tell me about Hillary Clinton?

No doubt the Dem contractors said stupid things and they paid the price. I don't trust O'Keefe to put out a legitimate video. He paid a $100,000 fine to an ACORN employee because of his carefully crafted ACORN video. And Watergate was about breaking and entering and the coverup, which is similar to what O'Keefe was convicted of.

 

All that being said, what do these videos tell me about Hillary Clinton?

 

That she's winning.

......

 

Phase II...double tap suicide.

 

...

 

 

390 times.....

 

Bet it will be a triple tap suicide...just to make sure.

No doubt the Dem contractors said stupid things and they paid the price. I don't trust O'Keefe to put out a legitimate video. He paid a $100,000 fine to an ACORN employee because of his carefully crafted ACORN video. And Watergate was about breaking and entering and the coverup, which is similar to what O'Keefe was convicted of.

 

All that being said, what do these videos tell me about Hillary Clinton?

Said stupid things? I would describe what they said as confessions to criminal conduct. What is your theory? Did O'Keefe pay the subjects of the video to "say stupid things?" Just how does one craft a video to make somebody boast about committing criminal acts? You must have a very low opinion of Bill Clinton, considering that he paid a hefty fine for lying under oath to a federal judge, paid more than $800,000 to settle Paula Corbin Jones' civil lawsuit against him, was impeached, and disbarred.

 

So please tell me what makes Hillary Clinton such a paragon of virtue, considering her attempts to intimidate her husbands' sexual partners and alleged victims into silence and to make them appear to be liars and/or crazy stalkers? Or do you doubt that she was an active member of his "bimbo eruption team?"

 

O'Keefe was not charged with breaking and entering as you falsely stated. He was convicted of entering a publicly owned federal building under false pretenses, which he did to gather facts about a taxpayer funded group engaged in illegal activity.

That she's winning.

 

 

According to apparently flawed polls.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPQDCMUCrf4

That she's winning.

 

That's a sad commentary on America.