rjs4470 Posted October 17, 2016 Posted October 17, 2016 Crickets. Anything said would just be immediately scoffed at and ridiculed. It's honestly not worth the time or effort anymore. Just one side baiting the other and why I haven't participated in this forum much since it's reinstatement.
All Blue Posted October 17, 2016 Posted October 17, 2016 So is this what people mean when they say she is more presidential like ?
Jesse James Posted October 17, 2016 Posted October 17, 2016 Anything said would just be immediately scoffed at and ridiculed. It's honestly not worth the time or effort anymore. Just one side baiting the other and why I haven't participated in this forum much since it's reinstatement. I cant see how you could defend whats coming out. Thats why you wont comment. Crooks.
Jesse James Posted October 17, 2016 Posted October 17, 2016 When I get home I will link the video here so it can be watched in this thread.
Jesse James Posted October 17, 2016 Posted October 17, 2016 Also just heard a interview with this guy and he said another video will be coming out tomorrow far worse than this one.
Hellcats Posted October 17, 2016 Posted October 17, 2016 Also just heard a interview with this guy and he said another video will be coming out tomorrow far worse than this one. If it ain't from CNN I ain't watching it. :lol2:
CBDV Posted October 17, 2016 Author Posted October 17, 2016 If it ain't from CNN I ain't watching it. :lol2: Clinton News Network? Figures. There are more videos, each one is supposed to be more incriminating.
rjs4470 Posted October 17, 2016 Posted October 17, 2016 I cant see how you could defend whats coming out. Thats why you wont comment. Crooks. Project Veritas has a long history of using deception and creative video editing to produce inflammatory, right wing propaganda. Look it it up...it's easily found, and supported by legitimate sources. They've gone as far as trying to entrapment and illegally entering government offices under false pretenses. The owners of PV have been successfully sued and paid 6 figure settlements and fined for their "journalistic practices". But I'm sure you checked them out and vetted the source before labeling this newest video as "truth". Maybe it true, maybe it isn't. But I need a few legitimately sourced facts and supported evidence before I believe anything from this group. Of course I'm sure I'll be labeled as a sheep, or bleeding heart liberal. But the truth is this a bad "journalism" from a less than reliable source. I'll go back and join the crickets again while you dissect and rebuke my post despite my accurate, factual, and substantiated description of the source.
Jesse James Posted October 17, 2016 Posted October 17, 2016 I never once called you a bleeding heart liberal. Its hard to dispute live video from more than one source.
MayfieldFan Posted October 17, 2016 Posted October 17, 2016 I never once called you a bleeding heart liberal. Its hard to dispute live video from more than one source. That's edited video though.
rjs4470 Posted October 17, 2016 Posted October 17, 2016 That's edited video though. Edited video with no supported facts, much of which are off camera voices.
rjs4470 Posted October 17, 2016 Posted October 17, 2016 I never once called you a bleeding heart liberal. Its hard to dispute live video from more than one source. And How solid are those sources?? 10 bad or questionable sources don't make a legitimate story.
Recommended Posts