May 15, 201610 yr If any of the information on those emails is I formation that is determined to be classified or secret then what she did would be tantamount to leaving the same info in file folder laying on a park bench in Central Park. If anyone picked it up or not doesn't matter, what matters is that the info could have been compromised through either neglect or her own personal hubris.
May 15, 201610 yr The email investigation is serious. But the much more serious investigation is the Clinton Foundation.
May 15, 201610 yr Author I wouldn't say worse just yet. The amount of information she has leaked and on what subjects and who ultimately was able to hack that info is soon to be discovered. Somebody or a few involved will be given immunity deals and the flood gates will open. They may find themselves on the Clinton death list though. If any of the information on those emails is I formation that is determined to be classified or secret then what she did would be tantamount to leaving the same info in file folder laying on a park bench in Central Park. If anyone picked it up or not doesn't matter, what matters is that the info could have been compromised through either neglect or her own personal hubris. Hillary's email getting hacked (if it did) is less of an offense by her than Petraeus intentionally handing classified information to someone.
May 15, 201610 yr Hillary's email getting hacked (if it did) is less of an offense by her than Petraeus intentionally handing classified information to someone. No not really. In the eyes of the law it's the same. It's mishandling of classified information. Each count a felony. How many emails did she delete... 33,000..lol ya it's the same.. Edited May 15, 201610 yr by Fear the Nation
May 15, 201610 yr Author No not really. In the eyes of the law it's the same. That could be true. I am looking at intent. Petraeus knowingly handed classified info to someone. Clinton (if we believe her) does not believe classified info hit her computer and she did not give info to anyone. Intent may not be a factor in a conviction but it will be a factor in punishment.
May 15, 201610 yr That could be true. I am looking at intent. Petraeus knowingly handed classified info to someone. Clinton (if we believe her) does not believe classified info hit her computer and she did not give info to anyone. Intent may not be a factor in a conviction but it will be a factor in punishment. I agree his intent was different.
May 15, 201610 yr Hillary's email getting hacked (if it did) is less of an offense by her than Petraeus intentionally handing classified information to someone. Not the way the law is written. It's pretty much the same.
May 15, 201610 yr Author Not the way the law is written. It's pretty much the same. So if it is pretty much the same the worst Clinton can expect is a misdemeanor and pay a fine.
May 15, 201610 yr Hillary's email getting hacked (if it did) is less of an offense by her than Petraeus intentionally handing classified information to someone. Make no mistake about it, HRC's offense was much more serious on a morality level, they're probably equal legally. Patreaus knew exactly who he was talking to and the person actually had a high security clearance level. Hillary had no idea who was getting into her email but she darn well knew it was a possibility and didn't care. That kind of arrogance is dangerous to this country.
May 15, 201610 yr So if it is pretty much the same the worst Clinton can expect is a misdemeanor and pay a fine. But you are stripped of your ability to have security clearance. How can you be the POTUS without one?
May 15, 201610 yr Author Make no mistake about it, HRC's offense was much more serious on a morality level, they're probably equal legally. Patreaus knew exactly who he was talking to and the person actually had a high security clearance level. Hillary had no idea who was getting into her email but she darn well knew it was a possibility and didn't care. That kind of arrogance is dangerous to this country. I was not aware that Hillary knew her email was being hacked. Did she continue to use that server after she found out she had been hacked? Did she take any measures to try and make it more secure?
May 15, 201610 yr I was not aware that Hillary knew her email was being hacked. Did she continue to use that server after she found out she had been hacked? Did she take any measures to try and make it more secure? Doesn't matter if she knew if it was getting hacked, it's against the law to have the info on a server outside of the US government.
May 15, 201610 yr Author Doesn't matter if she knew if it was getting hacked, it's against the law to have the info on a server outside of the US government. Is that classified info or any info involved in her job?
May 15, 201610 yr Is that classified info or any info involved in her job? I believe it's described to the affect of any sensitive information.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.