Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

As I have stated on prior threads, either the 7th is really competitive or really average, or both.

 

I mean, if Male is your top Dog and Trinity #2, this is a down year for this Region.

 

Male is struggling vs. lesser teams and Trinity just cannot handle the 11th region.

 

I think they are ok, by no means bad, but certainly beatable.

 

I like the 9th region champ to beat them in the opener this year at State.

Posted
As I have stated on prior threads, either the 7th is really competitive or really average, or both.

 

I mean, if Male is your top Dog and Trinity #2, this is a down year for this Region.

 

Male is struggling vs. lesser teams and Trinity just cannot handle the 11th region.

 

I think they are ok, by no means bad, but certainly beatable.

 

I like the 9th region champ to beat them in the opener this year at State.

Trinity is 4-2 against 11th region teams.

There is no super team this year in the 7th. Probably as many as 6 teams have a legitimate chance to win the region.

Posted

When you make the top play on sportscenter's top 10, you are deff a favorite to win region poy.

Its been Trinity or Ballard in 5 of the last years (with Eastern winning the region in '11). It's Male's time

Posted

Males guards may be their weakness. Cook is the best player in the region- but I like St Xs, Ballards and Centrals guards better- oh and Trinitys too. Guards determine who wins the 7th year after year.

Posted
Trinity is 4

 

I did not add up the wins but they have 3 losses to the 11th:

 

Dunbar, Henry Clay, Madison Central.

Sorry. Madison Central being in the 11th skipped right by me.

Posted
Is the 7th Region POY between Cook and McKim?

 

I think so. Both have had great seasons. Cook probably has a potentially higher future upside, but it has been a joy watching McKim in the St. X games I have seen this season. Bottom line is that they are both deserving.

Posted
I think so. Both have had great seasons. Cook probably has a potentially higher future upside, but it has been a joy watching McKim in the St. X games I have seen this season. Bottom line is that they are both deserving.

 

I agree. It's a tough call right now, but I'd go with McKim. They both are willing their teams to victories. I told someone the other day that Male is like a Manual with Alex Cook on it. I still believe he has more to work with than Connor McKim has at St. X, because like X the players surrounding Cook can shoot, but have more athleticism and speed than X's role players. Cook is a really good college prospect, and better than McKim ceiling wise, but McKim has had to do more this year. I think Connor McKim wins.

Posted
I agree. It's a tough call right now, but I'd go with McKim. They both are willing their teams to victories. I told someone the other day that Male is like a Manual with Alex Cook on it. I still believe he has more to work with than Connor McKim has at St. X, because like X the players surrounding Cook can shoot, but have more athleticism and speed than X's role players. Cook is a really good college prospect, and better than McKim ceiling wise, but McKim has had to do more this year. I think Connor McKim wins.

 

Totally agree. If I picked right now, I would go with Kim. But others may go with Cook, who is also very deserving.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...