TheDeuce Posted November 14, 2015 Posted November 14, 2015 Final. After starting 0-3, Cards are bowl eligible.
BillNye Posted November 14, 2015 Posted November 14, 2015 Didn't get to catch the game today, Deuce. Who got the nod at QB? Bolin again?
Getslow Posted November 14, 2015 Posted November 14, 2015 Didn't get to catch the game today, Deuce. Who got the nod at QB? Bolin again? Yeah, Bolin started -- and played the entire game at QB except one play. He also looked like hot garbage for large parts of it. The exact same things he was doing so well last week failed him on several occasions today. Still, I get why he's the guy. There were several moments when he would be going through the cadence and spot the defenders cheating then pull up and change the play. One resulted in a run play in which Radcliffe wasn't so much as touched until he crossed the goal line. He wasn't as calm with a hand in his face as he was against 'Cuse last week and it really hurt him.
UKfan1977 Posted November 14, 2015 Posted November 14, 2015 Cards got two gifts today. Both game changers. ACC officials were on top of it today.
TheDeuce Posted November 14, 2015 Author Posted November 14, 2015 Cards got two gifts today. Both game changers. ACC officials were on top of it today. Please explain. :lol2:
CoachBuckett Posted November 14, 2015 Posted November 14, 2015 Lamar played two plays and they both led to big gains. There times today I felt Lamar should have came in for a series. Thinks they should play both.
UKfan1977 Posted November 14, 2015 Posted November 14, 2015 Please explain. :lol2: You didn't watch the game? The announcers went on and on about it.
TheDeuce Posted November 14, 2015 Author Posted November 14, 2015 Lamar played two plays and they both led to big gains. There times today I felt Lamar should have came in for a series. Thinks they should play both. When he handed it off on Radcliffe's big run, it was a perfect read.
TheDeuce Posted November 14, 2015 Author Posted November 14, 2015 You didn't watch the game? The announcers went on and on about it. I was at the game, as usual. You'll have to explain these gifts...
UKfan1977 Posted November 14, 2015 Posted November 14, 2015 I was at the game, as usual. You'll have to explain these gifts... Interference on Quick on the Punt return in a tie game and On side kick which was recovered by Virgina they called illegal formation. Got both calls wrong.
BillNye Posted November 14, 2015 Posted November 14, 2015 Interference on Quick on the Punt return in a tie game and On side kick which was recovered by Virgina they called illegal formation. Got both calls wrong. Do you go to bed thinking about Louisville? You have a strange obsession... Atleast you're committed! Cats not making a bowl game... (Again)
UKfan1977 Posted November 14, 2015 Posted November 14, 2015 Do you go to bed thinking about Louisville? You have a strange obsession... Atleast you're committed! Cats not making a bowl game... (Again) Was giving my opinion in the thread just like you do in UK threads. Is it against the rules to post in certain threads?
BillNye Posted November 14, 2015 Posted November 14, 2015 Was giving my opinion in the thread just like you do in UK threads. Is it against the rules to post in certain threads? I'll just defer to your reasoning and say have a good day.
TheDeuce Posted November 14, 2015 Author Posted November 14, 2015 Interference on Quick on the Punt return in a tie game and On side kick which was recovered by Virgina they called illegal formation. Got both calls wrong. How was it interference on Quick if the guy caught the ball?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.