November 27, 201312 yr Yes. Worth every penny. I asked earlier how much the Lakers have made as a franchise since 1996 when Kobe joined the Lakers. The Lakers make 200 million a year from their Time Warner contract. Kobe will have made 320 million as a Laker by the time his career is over. All as a Laker. Yes. Kobe has been and will have been worth every penny the Lakers paid him over his 20 year career. I'm not arguing any of what you put there. My point is you don't pay someone on what they did for you in the past but on what they can do for you in future. If you don't agree then we agree to disagree.
November 27, 201312 yr Let's say Kobe is worth 25 million and I concede that (which I won't) why would someone like Kobe who "claims" to be the ultimate competitor not take less money to bring in a better team. So if the Lakers brought in LeBron next season, how does Kobe's contract affect bringing in a better team?
November 27, 201312 yr So if the Lakers brought in LeBron next season, how does Kobe's contract affect bringing in a better team? If Lebron goes to LA I'll buy a Kobe jersey.
November 27, 201312 yr I'm not arguing any of what you put there. My point is you don't pay someone on what they did for you in the past but on what they can do for you in future. If you don't agree then we agree to disagree. Kobe be is an exception to the rule. We'll agree to disagree. 17 years and 5 championships. 7 trips to the NBA Finals. I think he is underpaid. So you don't think Kobe will be the Lakers best or 2nd best player over the next 3 years?
November 27, 201312 yr Kobe be is an exception to the rule. We'll agree to disagree. 17 years and 5 championships. 7 trips to the NBA Finals. I think he is underpaid. So you don't think Kobe will be the Lakers best or 2nd best player over the next 3 years? I won't be surprised either way. The injury he had is devestating, even more so in my mind than Rose's injury from last year. I could see a lot of different scenarios. That is the only reason I wouldn't of pulled the trigger yet. That and I just don't trust the current Laker owner.
November 28, 201312 yr So you don't think Kobe will be the Lakers best or 2nd best player over the next 3 years? Yes, only because they have no one else. And with Kobe's contract they aren't likely to afford many good players to help fill out a roster.
November 28, 201312 yr Yes, only because they have no one else. And with Kobe's contract they aren't likely to afford many good players to help fill out a roster. The only player better than Kobe available in 2014 is Lebron. Don't kid yourself.
November 28, 201312 yr Barkley was killing Kobe for this contract on PTI Tuesday. Those of you defending him that's fine, but it doesn't make it any less true that this doesn't help his cause for a 6th ring. He took the money, great, but if he tries to sell it as best for a title quest that's nonsense. And to avoid massive hate from the Kobe supporters, I don't blame him for taking the money, but I personally think it ends any chance of a 6th title.
November 28, 201312 yr The only player better than Kobe available in 2014 is Lebron. Don't kid yourself. Either way. Lakers overpaid and paid him for past, not present or future. Bad move in a salary cap market.
November 28, 201312 yr Anybody who thinks the Lakers are winning a title with this roster is....uh...........not a fan of basketball. That's me being nice. I wonder about you guys sometimes. For real. We need a night out at a bar so I can set y'all straight. Holy crap.
November 28, 201312 yr Anybody who thinks the Lakers are winning a title with this roster is....uh...........not a fan of basketball. That's me being nice. I wonder about you guys sometimes. For real. We need a night out at a bar so I can set y'all straight. Holy crap. Who said they were winning a title with this roster? I understand why they did the deal both Kobe and the Lakers but I do think it's a bad deal that hinders them the next 2 years. Time will tell though.
November 28, 201312 yr Who said they were winning a title with this roster? I understand why they did the deal both Kobe and the Lakers but I do think it's a bad deal that hinders them the next 2 years. Time will tell though. And I don't see how locking up your best player for his final 2 years for at least 10 million less is anymore of a hinderance than now.
November 28, 201312 yr The only player better than Kobe available in 2014 is Lebron. Don't kid yourself. Kobe fan dreaming. P.S. save me a drumstick
November 28, 201312 yr Anybody who thinks the Lakers are winning a title with this roster is....uh...........not a fan of basketball. That's me being nice. I wonder about you guys sometimes. For real. We need a night out at a bar so I can set y'all straight. Holy crap. Lakers don't have a roster next year its why every penny counts.
November 28, 201312 yr And I don't see how locking up your best player for his final 2 years for at least 10 million less is anymore of a hinderance than now. Because your current best player might not be elite anymore
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.