No no no......go re-read that post again please. I said, and I quote, If Dixie beat Cooper I would admit Conner was better. Going by common opponents you know. Go find that post please.

 

I found that post for you RE

http://bluegrasspreps.com/ky-football-high/kentucky-class-5a-243584-page2.html#post4493318

 

Enjoy reading it.

 

Really? Why do you need to go to "Common Opponents" when you played head-to-head and lost ?

Really? Why do you need to go to "Common Opponents" when you played head-to-head and lost ?

 

That is the logic that I use.

Really? Why do you need to go to "Common Opponents" when you played head-to-head and lost ?

So that meanst the Bengals were better than the Steelers the years they won the SB but the bengals beat them?

 

 

Actually DTH and RE made that criteria crystal clear last year when Cooper beat Conner yet they still claimed Conner was better. So which is it?

 

So I guess then Dixie and So. Oldham should also be ranked above Conner right? I mean they went head to head with Conner and beat them right?

 

So Dixie is better than Conner

So. Oldham is better than Conner

Cooper is better than Dixie

Cooper is better than So. Oldham

yet Conner is better than Cooper, did I get that right?

So that meanst the Bengals were better than the Steelers the years they won the SB but the bengals beat them?

 

Actually DTH and RE made that criteria crystal clear last year when Cooper beat Conner yet they still claimed Conner was better. So which is it?

 

So I guess then Dixie and So. Oldham should also be ranked above Conner right? I mean they went head to head with Conner and beat them right?

 

So Dixie is better than Conner

So. Oldham is better than Conner

Cooper is better than Dixie

Cooper is better than So. Oldham

yet Conner is better than Cooper, did I get that right?

 

You let facts and actual events get in your way of making a good argument. You know the Bengals would of beaten the Steelers had they not taken Palmers knee out. C'mon man.

Didn't you claim last year along with RE that Conner was better than Cooper?

Didn't Cooper beat Conner last year?

 

I thought so

 

I wasn't a member of this site last year little buddy... But I'll say it now if it makes you feel better Conner was better than Cooper last year and still is better than Cooper this year.

 

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Epic using Forum Runner

 

That is the logic that I use.

 

Me too

 

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Epic using Forum Runner

 

Me too

 

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Epic using Forum Runner

 

I think most would use this logic. Just makes sense.

 

I think most would use this logic. Just makes sense.

 

Most would use it... It makes sense to everyone except Hellbird and UK#1fan

 

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Epic using Forum Runner

You let facts and actual events get in your way of making a good argument. You know the Bengals would of beaten the Steelers had they not taken Palmers knee out. C'mon man.

That I can agree with, but I wasn't talking about just that year. We beat them back in the 70's too you know.

 

So may I ask you and DTH now since the criteria you use this year is only head to head you base your opinion on? Was Cooper better than Conner last year?

Most would use it... It makes sense to everyone except Hellbird and UK#1fan

 

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Epic using Forum Runner

So you are admitting that Cooper was better than Conner last year then?

 

I'll wait for your answer.

As a Cooper fan I could care less who is 2, 3 6 7 or 8. You're in the dance so it's time to put up or shut up. I know kids on both teams and wish both teams well. Let's get it on...........

So you are admitting that Cooper was better than Conner last year then?

 

I'll wait for your answer.

 

You were on the Bengals roster in the 70's?

 

I've already said that Conner was better than Cooper last year, and they are better than them this year..

 

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Epic using Forum Runner

Really? Why do you need to go to "Common Opponents" when you played head-to-head and lost ?

I'm just using the same criteria they used after last season. Funny how I nailed that near the beginning of this season isn't it? I predicted earlier this season after RE and others claimed Conner was better than Cooper last year even though Cooper beat them last year that this year if Conner beat Cooper they wouldn't use the same criteria and no matter what would claim Conner to be the better team. Next year if Cooper beats Conner they will still claim Conner to be better.

That has been my point all along.

I'm just using the same criteria they used after last season. Funny how I nailed that near the beginning of this season isn't it? I predicted earlier this season after RE and others claimed Conner was better than Cooper last year even though Cooper beat them last year that this year if Conner beat Cooper they wouldn't use the same criteria and no matter what would claim Conner to be the better team. Next year if Cooper beats Conner they will still claim Conner to be better.

That has been my point all along.

 

You are living in the past my friend... The majority of your posts bring up last year's game... These threads are for this season

 

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Epic using Forum Runner

I'm just using the same criteria they used after last season. Funny how I nailed that near the beginning of this season isn't it? I predicted earlier this season after RE and others claimed Conner was better than Cooper last year even though Cooper beat them last year that this year if Conner beat Cooper they wouldn't use the same criteria and no matter what would claim Conner to be the better team. Next year if Cooper beats Conner they will still claim Conner to be better.

That has been my point all along.

 

The nice thing is that if both teams do what they need to, we will get to find out. Should be fun to watch and even more fun to read the threads afterwards