October 27, 201213 yr How so? You think this type of ad is really targeted at those that are informed or pay attention to what's going on? There's absolutely no substance to the ad. As to BGPers that aren't in the know. Would't they automatically fall into the same category? If we are going to gives yeas/nays to ads as far as being promoted to an intelligent crowd then the ads would go away. There are plenty of people who will respond to the ad in question that are "in the know" at the same level as almost every other ad. We see it on here all the time.
October 27, 201213 yr If we are going to gives yeas/nays to ads as far as being promoted to an intelligent crowd then the ads would go away. There are plenty of people who will respond to the ad in question that are "in the know" at the same level as almost every other ad. We see it on here all the time. I'm not saying get rid of the ad, just that it's stupid and appeals to those that don't require substance. I'm not sure if you're saying people in the know will respond negatively to such ads or that they're being reached in ads like this. If the latter, I disagree.
October 27, 201213 yr If there was truly an ad for people 'in the know' then there would be less ads wouldn't there? Every ad has an intended target. I'm still waiting for the Romney ad that targets me.
October 27, 201213 yr It's not a good ad (and I'm one who has missed the boat on Lena Dunham), which is why it's a web ad. That means the campaign isn't spending any money promoting it and is looking for free publicity, if anything at all. And they're getting. It also helps that there's not a better group to go on national TV and talk about sex than Republicans.
October 27, 201213 yr If there was truly an ad for people 'in the know' then there would be less ads wouldn't there? Every ad has an intended target. I'm still waiting for the Romney ad that targets me. People "in the know" really don't need an ad, do they?
October 27, 201213 yr If there was truly an ad for people 'in the know' then there would be less ads wouldn't there? Every ad has an intended target. I'm still waiting for the Romney ad that targets me.I think both sides have ads that target people that pay attention. Both have silly fluff ads like the one in the thread as well. FWIW, this is the second campaign for Obama, I've yet to see an Obama ad that actually targets me, so I feel ya.
October 27, 201213 yr People "in the know" really don't need an ad, do they?Good question. You'd have to ask people like rockmom. Informed but on the fence on whom to vote for. At least I think I recall rockmom recently saying she was still on the fence.
October 27, 201213 yr Good question. You'd have to ask people like rockmom. Informed but on the fence on whom to vote for. At least I think I recall rockmom recently saying she was still on the fence. Yeah, about that....Gov Romney pushed me off the fence. As to this ad, I wouldn't have been the target audience. I find it to be a clever way to relate to first time voters who appreciate the use of the internet and a catchy hook. No problems with it.
October 27, 201213 yr Yeah, about that....Gov Romney pushed me off the fence. As to this ad, I wouldn't have been the target audience. I find it to be a clever way to relate to first time voters who appreciate the use of the internet and a catchy hook. No problems with it.Gotcha. I see nothing clever about the ad. Just an ad with zero substance for people that need no substance.
October 27, 201213 yr Gotcha. I see nothing clever about the ad. Just an ad with zero substance for people that need no substance. C'mon...it's no worse than baseless vitriol laden ads. It is what it is. Personally, I'd rather see an ad like this than the traditional doom and gloom attack ad.
October 27, 201213 yr C'mon...it's no worse than baseless vitriol laden ads. It is what it is. Personally, I'd rather see an ad like this than the traditional doom and gloom attack ad.That's my point. It's baseless. It's also sophomoric. I don't like attack ads either, really. I'd prefer to hear a candidates vision without the attacks. Sadly, that's not what works.
October 27, 201213 yr That's my point. It's baseless. It's also sophomoric. I don't like attack ads either' date=' really. I'd prefer to hear a candidates vision without the attacks. Sadly, that's not what works.[/quote'] So...you are agreeing that this ad is no worse than others? Just different?
October 27, 201213 yr So...you are agreeing that this ad is no worse than others? Just different? Worse than some moronic attack ads or fluff ads, no worse than some. Nowhere near the same or good as ads that actually try to reach people.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.