Just going by how opinions on thing change on how things turn out. And quite frankly I don't care what you have to say about how many words I wrote. Thats usually the best argument someone has back is to talk about how many words I wrote.

 

As for LRCW the reward was much greater than the risk in the Washington game than it was in the Jags game. The Washington game they were winning and had them pinned down even if they didn't get it. The Jags game they were losing and would have given the Jags great field position if they didn't get it. So yes I would think people's opinion would have been different if they agreed with it or not if it didnt work. Especially when they say the reward was greater than the risk in this case. The risk in this case was higher than it was in the Washington game.

 

Again, there is no way you can prove you're point no matter how many words you write. Not when you're argument is to tell people how they feel about a matter or how they would have felt if it went differently. If you want to argue that the Bengals defense doesn't suck, fine have at it. But it is just silly to tell us all how we would react if a fake punt didn't work. You have no idea what any of us are thinking.

Again, there is no way you can prove you're point no matter how many words you write. Not when you're argument is to tell people how they feel about a matter or how they would have felt if it went differently. If you want to argue that the Bengals defense doesn't suck, fine have at it. But it is just silly to tell us all how we would react if a fake punt didn't work. You have no idea what any of us are thinking.

 

You are right, I can just go based on how things usually go when it comes to the Bengals. Especially when things don't work out, and that is people usually complaining about how bad of a decision something was. However maybe magically you all would have came out and said we did agree with the call even if it didn't work and ended up being a huge turning point in the game against the Bengals. So you are right I can't say for sure, however it sure is easy for people to say they would have agreed with it since it did work. But I can't prove it so you are right.

You are very mistaken. I don't even read your posts any more when they are books. People can't disagree with you and follow along b/c you say the same exact thing over and over sentence after sentence so we quit reading after the 1st sentence hoping you didn't make a good point somewhere in the middle.

 

Funny thing is you reply back more to me than anyone else. Yes I am not good at just saying a few words. When I have an opinion I actually give reasons why I feel that way. When most people just say they suck and don't look more into and look at things as a whole and all the different parts that go into. I actually try to make an educated opinion on things, especially when it comes to the Bengals. I don't let all the years of bad make me bias in thinking well they just will suck eventually again like many others. Just like last year I gave plenty of reasons why they would do well last year, and most people disagreed just because they saw all the changes and assumed they would be bad. Just like this year you basically assumed that they would struggle at receiver. Yet if you went to a few practices like I did, and actually looked at the things they did and how they would fit in the offense you would have seen that it could work. Yes I am wrong on somethings, however I have a lot to because I try to back my opinions and have reasons to back them unlike many others. Who then like to ignore those things. I know I have been wrong on things, and one of the big things I was wrong on that I supported was Palmer which I admit I was wrong. Which it would take him to have an amazing year for me not to be wrong and I don't see that happening.

Funny thing is you reply back more to me than anyone else. Yes I am not good at just saying a few words. When I have an opinion I actually give reasons why I feel that way. When most people just say they suck and don't look more into and look at things as a whole and all the different parts that go into. I actually try to make an educated opinion on things, especially when it comes to the Bengals. I don't let all the years of bad make me bias in thinking well they just will suck eventually again like many others. Just like last year I gave plenty of reasons why they would do well last year, and most people disagreed just because they saw all the changes and assumed they would be bad. Just like this year you basically assumed that they would struggle at receiver. Yet if you went to a few practices like I did, and actually looked at the things they did and how they would fit in the offense you would have seen that it could work. Yes I am wrong on somethings, however I have a lot to because I try to back my opinions and have reasons to back them unlike many others. Who then like to ignore those things. I know I have been wrong on things, and one of the big things I was wrong on that I supported was Palmer which I admit I was wrong. Which it would take him to have an amazing year for me not to be wrong and I don't see that happening.

 

I almost always reply to your first sentence and that's it if it is this long. If its shorter I usually read the whole thing. I'm not trying to be mean or call you out. Just letting you know what I do and at least one other person told me they do the same thing.

The reply to the post about how long your posts are is longer than any post I have ever written. I love it. :lol:

I almost always reply to your first sentence and that's it if it is this long. If its shorter I usually read the whole thing. I'm not trying to be mean or call you out. Just letting you know what I do and at least one other person told me they do the same thing.

 

The reply to the post about how long your posts are is longer than any post I have ever written. I love it. :lol:

 

Which is great, because we both joined around the same time. Yet I have always posted like this and will continue to know matter what people say . If people don't read it thats fine too.

 

As for SSC if your only going to read the first sentence, then just no reason to reply at all to the first sentence. Just keep ignoring them like you do sometimes.

Which is great, because we both joined around the same time. Yet I have always posted like this and will continue to know matter what people say . If people don't read it thats fine too.

 

As for SSC if your only going to read the first sentence, then just no reason to reply at all to the first sentence. Just keep ignoring them like you do sometimes.

 

The first sentence and the next 99 usually say the same thing.

As a longtime Bengal fan I am still not over the 1999 draft that set the franchise back 10 years (Akili Smith 3rd overall???), but they have been fun to watch this season. Keep it up!