6 black kids beat a white man and they will not be charged with a hate crime. This is outrageous. If it were 6 white kids who beat up a black guy they'd be charged with a hate crime. They would already be under the jail and the revs would be everywhere. The black kids said they were bored and that's why they did it. These little ignorant kids need to be locked up forever. Society has no use for them. I hope they get what is going to come to them one day. Try that in Kentucky.

 

Police: Man attacked because teens 'were just bored' | Cincinnati.com | cincinnati.com

Not a hate crime as it sounds like he was just the first available victim for these punks.

In 2012 if blacks beat or kill whites it is frustration, so its ok.

 

In 2012 if whites beat or kill blacks it is hate crime and protest form everywhere. Plus Obama chimes his 2 cents worth in the matter and says teachable moment and it may look like his kid.

 

Of course its a hate crime, just like if it happened the other way around.

Edited August 16, 201214 yr by mountain ref

75, from what I have read that seems to be the case, however I do see Starks point as well.

Is this any different than the black kids who set the white kid on fire in St. Louis (I think it was St. Louis, someone correct me if it wasn't)?

6 black kids beat a white man and they will not be charged with a hate crime. This is outrageous. If it were 6 white kids who beat up a black guy they'd be charged with a hate crime. They would already be under the jail and the revs would be everywhere. The black kids said they were bored and that's why they did it. These little ignorant kids need to be locked up forever. Society has no use for them. I hope they get what is going to come to them one day. Try that in Kentucky.

 

Police: Man attacked because teens 'were just bored' | Cincinnati.com | cincinnati.com

 

 

I can't recall the last time I have heard of a hate crime in Cincinnati. I will assume whites have beaten blacks in Cincinnati so that would seem to dispel that notion that it would automatically be a hate crime if it was reversed.

Is this any different than the black kids who set the white kid on fire in St. Louis (I think it was St. Louis, someone correct me if it wasn't)?

 

Unless the 6 yelled something about the guy being white then , yes, it is different.

But then again isnt every crime a HATE crime regardless of color.

But then again isnt every crime a HATE crime regardless of color.

 

A crime of this nature certainly is.

I can't recall the last time I have heard of a hate crime in Cincinnati. I will assume whites have beaten blacks in Cincinnati so that would seem to dispel that notion that it would automatically be a hate crime if it was reversed.

 

You assume.

 

Well I'll assume that if 6 white kids beat up an unemployed black guy with a 6 pack of beer Al and Jessie would be all per Cincy with the NAACP screaming hate crime. And they'd probably be convicted.

You assume.

 

Well I'll assume that if 6 white kids beat up an unemployed black guy with a 6 pack of beer Al and Jessie would be all per Cincy with the NAACP screaming hate crime. And they'd probably be convicted.

 

So in order for your theory to be right and considering we havent heard of any hate crimes there must be no crimes where whites attack blacks in Cincinnati. I find that hard to believe.

Maybe the media doesn't want to talk about it. I don't know. All I know is black people may see this and start beating up white people for no reason now. The Black Panthers are going to have a field day now. Beat up white people and it's not a hate crime?

Race aside...I think the most appalling trend right now is the "because I was bored" trend. Similar situation happened in Evansville a couple of months ago. Because you were flippin' BORED?!!! Read a dang book...play some basketball, hook up the 360....you don't beat and/or kill people because you are BORED!

Did the six black youths even take the 6pack of beer the guy had?

The hate crime up charge should be done away with.