August 3, 201214 yr Haha. You couldn't be more wrong. Almost every team puts a lot of their players on the waiver wire. It does not mean they cut him. If you would have read the article that you posted you would have seen that.
August 3, 201214 yr WOW. I don't even know what to say except a dumb move by Philadelphia. You should probably figure out what it means to place someone on waivers before posting anymore...
August 3, 201214 yr WOW. I don't even know what to say except a dumb move by Philadelphia. Again, read the article. From August 1st to August 31st players can be put on the waiver wire, if they are claimed the teams have so many as to work out a trade, if not traded the player is pulled from the waiver wire and nothing happens.
August 3, 201214 yr You should probably figure out what it means to place someone on waivers before posting anymore... Bingo.
August 3, 201214 yr Teams have to pass players through revocable waivers to trade them after the July 31st deadline. Players acquired after August 31st can't play in the postseason. Teams will often put most of their players on waivers to determine interest, since they don't have to give up every player who's claimed. Unclaimed players can be traded to any club in August (or even September). Teams don't have to trade players who are claimed. They can hand the player and his salary over for nothing. If a team places a player on waivers after he is claimed, but not traded, the team loses the right to pull its player back. In other words, the waivers are revocable at first, but not revocable afterwards. Clubs have two days to deal claimed players, but they can only negotiate a trade with one team. If only one team claims a player, he can only be dealt to that team. If more than one team claims a player, he can only be traded to the claiming team in his league with the worst record. If a player's only claimed by teams in the other league, he can only be dealt to the claiming team with the worst record. Teams cannot pass players on the disabled list through waivers. From http://www.mlbtraderumors.com
August 3, 201214 yr Author He's a good pitcher. That's why it was dumb by Philadelphia unless there doing it to get rid of his contract, if they can get another team to claim him and work out a trade. They should have thought about that before going out and building an all star team with huge contracts
August 3, 201214 yr He's a good pitcher. That's why it was dumb by Philadelphia unless there doing it to get rid of his contract, if they can get another team to claim him and work out a trade. They should have thought about that before going out and building an all star team with huge contracts Of course their trying to get rid of his contract, they realize now it was dumb to sign him to that. But for the record they did not cut him. Glad someone changed the title of the thread.
August 3, 201214 yr Thx for the explanation. I did not know all the ins and outs either. Learn something new everyday.
August 3, 201214 yr Author Of course their trying to get rid of his contract, they realize now it was dumb to sign him to that. But for the record they did not cut him. Glad someone changed the title of the thread. I wouldn't wanna pay a contract like that. Athletes get some of the most ridiculous contracts I've ever seen
August 3, 201214 yr Why is this bad? Guys go on waivers often, doesn't mean they are getting cut or anything. It's just another trading strategy and also a chess match sometimes between teams.
August 3, 201214 yr The Phils are said to be looking for a team that will give top prospects and not expect the Phils to eat any of the salary. They either change that position or he's in Philly next season.
August 3, 201214 yr He's a good pitcher. That's why it was dumb by Philadelphia unless there doing it to get rid of his contract, if they can get another team to claim him and work out a trade. They should have thought about that before going out and building an all star team with huge contracts There is nothing dumb about it. No risk at all to Philly. If they don't get a deal they like (which would need to be HUGE), nothing happens. Almost every team that's not in it will place lots of players on waivers, very few of which ever get moved. With Lee's very short list of teams that he would accept a trade to (I think it is about 8) and Philly's high asking price, this only happens on their terms. If it does happen, they get their system replenished, get some money to sign free agents, and still have Halladay, Blanton, Hamels, and Worley, a very solid front four in their rotation. Literally, hundreds of players get placed on waivers in the beginning of August. Heath Bell, Carlos Pena, Jim Thome, and Carl Crawford are some of the other players who just got placed on waivers. Now if he were designated for assignment, that would be the equivalent of cutting him, and would be monumentally stupid.
August 3, 201214 yr You need to look at the waivers more often. It's a Amazing how many players get placed on them. Nothing out of the ordinary and I'm sure the Phillies are hoping for someone to get DESPERATE or he will remain a Philly.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.