Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

BluegrassPreps.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Do the Reds have the best pen???

Featured Replies

^Along those lines, I'm thinking around June 1st is when we'll see him moved into the rotation.

 

That would be a nice birthday present for me. :D The bigger question is do they let him get stretched out up here or do they send him down for 2 weeks?

  • Replies 63
  • Views 6.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
That would be a nice birthday present for me. :D The bigger question is do they let him get stretched out up here or do they send him down for 2 weeks?

 

Hard to imagine not sending him down for at least two starts in Louisville...

With the innings restrictions put in place by the organization, I think it is the only way to have him available for 6 months. Do you think it is best to only have him from April to early August as a starter and then nothing for the last 2 months???
I think that with his previous pitching history in Cuba you don't impose an IP limit on him. If the Reds are indeed going to put him in a strict IP limit a la Strausburg then I can see this possibly being the more advantageous route. However, the more innings he gets as a starter I think the more valuable he is to the club...

 

I also feel there is much more potential for damage by stretching him out as a starter in ST, bringing him back to the pen, then back to the rotation later in the year. All-in-all the Reds have botched their handling of Chapman up to this point in my opinion. You are paying him starter money, he has the starter stuff, and is a much better option than Leake and Arroyo...start him.

I think that with his previous pitching history in Cuba you don't impose an IP limit on him. If the Reds are indeed going to put him in a strict IP limit a la Strausburg then I can see this possibly being the more advantageous route. However, the more innings he gets as a starter I think the more valuable he is to the club...

 

I also feel there is much more potential for damage by stretching him out as a starter in ST, bringing him back to the pen, then back to the rotation later in the year. All-in-all the Reds have botched their handling of Chapman up to this point in my opinion. You are paying him starter money, he has the starter stuff, and is a much better option than Leake and Arroyo...start him.

 

The number I have heard is 160 innings. His max number of innings in Cuba was 118. That crushes your argument there...

The number I have heard is 160 innings. His max number of innings in Cuba was 118. That crushes your argument there...
...not really. But thanks for playing.
...not really. But thanks for playing.

 

Ever heard of the Verducci effect?

The number I have heard is 160 innings. His max number of innings in Cuba was 118. That crushes your argument there...
Do you know the max number of innings Verlander pitched in college?
I think that with his previous pitching history in Cuba you don't impose an IP limit on him. If the Reds are indeed going to put him in a strict IP limit a la Strausburg then I can see this possibly being the more advantageous route. However, the more innings he gets as a starter I think the more valuable he is to the club...

 

I also feel there is much more potential for damage by stretching him out as a starter in ST, bringing him back to the pen, then back to the rotation later in the year. All-in-all the Reds have botched their handling of Chapman up to this point in my opinion. You are paying him starter money, he has the starter stuff, and is a much better option than Leake and Arroyo...start him.

 

As to the bolded....2-1, 2.75 ERA, 27 K's, 4 BBs in 39.1 IP says differently at least for Arroyo.

I think that with his previous pitching history in Cuba you don't impose an IP limit on him. If the Reds are indeed going to put him in a strict IP limit a la Strausburg then I can see this possibly being the more advantageous route. However, the more innings he gets as a starter I think the more valuable he is to the club...

 

I also feel there is much more potential for damage by stretching him out as a starter in ST, bringing him back to the pen, then back to the rotation later in the year. All-in-all the Reds have botched their handling of Chapman up to this point in my opinion. You are paying him starter money, he has the starter stuff, and is a much better option than Leake and Arroyo...start him.

 

Did you consult the Marlins on how to use Josh Johnson? How has that worked out?

Did you consult the Marlins on how to use Josh Johnson? How has that worked out?
Well...glad to see you don't plan on participating. :D
Do you know the max number of innings Verlander pitched in college?

 

Sure do. He also threw 130 innings in 2005 combined to at least bridge the gap to 186 the next year. Swing and a miss...

Well...glad to see you don't plan on participating. :D

 

 

As a Marlins fan you enjoy seeing him going down every other year?

Sure do. He also threw 130 innings in 2005 combined to at least bridge the gap to 186 the next year. Swing and a miss...
Good try...

 

If I put those three dots it means I'm right and nobody should dare question my intelligence, right? :D

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.