Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

BluegrassPreps.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Jobs Report - Less than forecast

Featured Replies

Sorry to report....the report is 'missing one large state'.

 

 

Why the Drop in Weekly Jobless Claims Is Flawed - 24/7 Wall St.

"CNBC and Dowicon1.png Jones have both confirmed that this latest weekly jobless claims report was missing data from one large state. Bloomberg noted that the Labor Department spokesperson said that one state accounted for most of the plunge in claims."

 

 

 

That was a misinterpretation of the report. What the report said was that most of the drop occurred because one state that was anticipating a large increase did not in fact have that drop. The data from all states were included.

  • Replies 91
  • Views 13.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Author
That was a misinterpretation of the report. What the report said was that most of the drop occurred because one state that was anticipating a large increase did not in fact have that drop. The data from all states were included.

 

It was included....but that state forgot to process a bunch of forms apparently...

 

Jobless claims plunge to four-year low - Economic Report - MarketWatch

 

“As a result, there is an accumulation of claims that are likely submitted over a period of several weeks but not processed until the turn of the quarter. Apparently, the state in question (and it pretty much has to be California to account for anything close to 30,000) forgot to include that stockpile of unprocessed claims in their tally for this week (which is the first week of a new calendar quarter). Since the seasonal factors expected an unadjusted surge of almost 20% in the period to account for the quarterly filing pattern, failure to adhere to that pattern in the raw data (unadjusted claims were only up 8.6%) creates a big drop seasonally adjusted.”

 

Emphasis added.

 

It is confirmed that 'one state' accounted for the drop. If it is real then they should figure what that state is doing right (at least for one week). It seems the state in question is a mystery. If you find out the state and actual anomaly please post.

  • Author

Back to (new) normal apparently. 388,000.

 

This is the highest initial report since this has been tracked here. They are citing 'technical factors'. Not sure what that is at this point.

 

 

Weekly Jobless Claims Post Huge Gain, Back to Normalized Reporting - 24/7 Wall St.

 

From above:

 

"The weekly claims rose by 46,000 to 388,000 but last week’s claims were revised higher to 342,000 from the prior artificially low number of 339,000. That higher revision still obviously does not include the data4.gif from the missing large state."

 

 

 

 

 

March 15: Reported - 351,000, Revised - 353,000

March 22: Reported - 348,000, Revised - 364,000 Reported - down 5,000, Actual - up 11,000, Revision: +16,000 ***

March 29: Reported - 359,000, Revised - 363,000 Reported - down 5,000, Actual - down 1,000, Revision: +4,000

April 05: Reported - 357,000, Revised - 367,000 Reported - down 6,000, Actual - up 4,000, Revision: +10,000 ***

April 12: Reported - 380,000, Revised - 388,000 Reported - up 13,000, Actual - up 21,000, Revision: +8,000

April 19: Reported - 386,000, Revised - 389,000 Reported - down 2,000, Actual - up 1,000, Revision: +3,000 ***

April 26: Reported - 388,000, Revised - 392,000 Reported - down 1,000, Actual - up 3,000, Revision: +4,000 ***

May 03: Reported - 365,000, Revised - 368,000 Reported - down 27,000, Actual - down 24,000, Revision: +3,000

May 10: Reported - 367,000, Revised - 370,000 Reported - down 1,000, Actual - up 2,000, Revision: +3,000 ***

May 17: Reported - 370,000, Revised - 372,000 Reported - no chg, Actual - up 2,000, Revision: +2,000 ***

May 24: Reported - 370,000, Revised - 373,000 Reported - down 2,000, Actual - up 1,000, Revision: +3,000 ***

May 31: Reported - 383,000, Revised - 389,000 Reported - up 10,000, Actual - up 16,000, Revision: +6,000

June 07: Reported - 377,000, Revised - 380,000 Reported - down 12,000, Actual - down 9,000, Revision: +3,000

June 14: Reported - 386,000, Revised - 389,000 Reported - up 6,000, Actual - 9,000, Revision: +3,000

June 21: Reported - 387,000, Revised - 392,000, Reported - down 2,000, Actual - up 3,000, Revision: +5,000 ***

June 28: Reported - 386,000, Revised - 388,000, Reported - down 6,000, Actual - down 4,000, Revision: +2,000

July 05: Reported - 374,000, Revised - 376,000, Reported - down 14,000, Actual - down 12,000, Revision" +2,000

July 12: Reported - 350,000, Revised - 352,000, Reported - down 26,000, Actual - down 24,000, Revision: +2,000

July 19: Reported - 386,000, Revised - 388,000, Reported - up 34,000, Actual - up 36,000, Revision: +2,000

July 26: Reported - 353,000, Revised - 357,000, Reported - down 25,000, Actual - down 21,000, Revision: +4,000

August 2: Reported - 365,000, Revised - 367,000, Reported - up 8,000, Actual - up 10,000, Revision: +2,000

August 9: Reported - 361,000, Revised - 364,000, Reported - down 6,000, Actual - down 3000, Revision: +3,000

August 16: Reported - 366,000. Revised - 368.000. Reported up 2000, Actual -up 4000, Revision: +2,000

August 23: Reported - 372,000.Revised - 374,000, Reported up 4000, Actual - up 6000, Revision: +2,000

August 30: Reported - 374,000. Revised - 377,000, Reported up 2000, Actual - up 3000, Revision: +3,000

September 6: Reported - 365,000, Revised - 367,000, Reported down 12,000, Actual - down 10,000, Revision: +2,000

September 13: Reported - 382,000, Revised - 386,000, Reported - up 15,000, Actual - up 18,000, Revision: +4,000

September 20: Reported - 382,000, Revised - 385,000, Reported - down 4,000, Actual - down 1,000, Revision: +3,000

September 27: Reported - 359,000, Revised - 363,000, Reported - down 16,000, Actual - down 12,000, Revision: +4,000

October 4: Reported - 367,000, Revised - 369,000, Reported - up 8,000, Actual - up 10,000, Revision: +2,000

October 11: Reported - 339,000, Revised - 342,000, Reported - down, Actual - ????

October 18: Reported - 388,000

 

Are the 'unprocessed' files from a large state still missing? It would appear so. The impact will be an artificially low 4-week moving average.

 

In fact USA Today cites the 4-week moving average in their run of an unusually terse AP release.

 

Unemployment benefit claims jump 46,000

  • Author

March 15: Reported - 351,000, Revised - 353,000

March 22: Reported - 348,000, Revised - 364,000 Reported - down 5,000, Actual - up 11,000, Revision: +16,000 ***

March 29: Reported - 359,000, Revised - 363,000 Reported - down 5,000, Actual - down 1,000, Revision: +4,000

April 05: Reported - 357,000, Revised - 367,000 Reported - down 6,000, Actual - up 4,000, Revision: +10,000 ***

April 12: Reported - 380,000, Revised - 388,000 Reported - up 13,000, Actual - up 21,000, Revision: +8,000

April 19: Reported - 386,000, Revised - 389,000 Reported - down 2,000, Actual - up 1,000, Revision: +3,000 ***

April 26: Reported - 388,000, Revised - 392,000 Reported - down 1,000, Actual - up 3,000, Revision: +4,000 ***

May 03: Reported - 365,000, Revised - 368,000 Reported - down 27,000, Actual - down 24,000, Revision: +3,000

May 10: Reported - 367,000, Revised - 370,000 Reported - down 1,000, Actual - up 2,000, Revision: +3,000 ***

May 17: Reported - 370,000, Revised - 372,000 Reported - no chg, Actual - up 2,000, Revision: +2,000 ***

May 24: Reported - 370,000, Revised - 373,000 Reported - down 2,000, Actual - up 1,000, Revision: +3,000 ***

May 31: Reported - 383,000, Revised - 389,000 Reported - up 10,000, Actual - up 16,000, Revision: +6,000

June 07: Reported - 377,000, Revised - 380,000 Reported - down 12,000, Actual - down 9,000, Revision: +3,000

June 14: Reported - 386,000, Revised - 389,000 Reported - up 6,000, Actual - 9,000, Revision: +3,000

June 21: Reported - 387,000, Revised - 392,000, Reported - down 2,000, Actual - up 3,000, Revision: +5,000 ***

June 28: Reported - 386,000, Revised - 388,000, Reported - down 6,000, Actual - down 4,000, Revision: +2,000

July 05: Reported - 374,000, Revised - 376,000, Reported - down 14,000, Actual - down 12,000, Revision" +2,000

July 12: Reported - 350,000, Revised - 352,000, Reported - down 26,000, Actual - down 24,000, Revision: +2,000

July 19: Reported - 386,000, Revised - 388,000, Reported - up 34,000, Actual - up 36,000, Revision: +2,000

July 26: Reported - 353,000, Revised - 357,000, Reported - down 25,000, Actual - down 21,000, Revision: +4,000

August 2: Reported - 365,000, Revised - 367,000, Reported - up 8,000, Actual - up 10,000, Revision: +2,000

August 9: Reported - 361,000, Revised - 364,000, Reported - down 6,000, Actual - down 3000, Revision: +3,000

August 16: Reported - 366,000. Revised - 368.000. Reported up 2000, Actual -up 4000, Revision: +2,000

August 23: Reported - 372,000.Revised - 374,000, Reported up 4000, Actual - up 6000, Revision: +2,000

August 30: Reported - 374,000. Revised - 377,000, Reported up 2000, Actual - up 3000, Revision: +3,000

September 6: Reported - 365,000, Revised - 367,000, Reported down 12,000, Actual - down 10,000, Revision: +2,000

September 13: Reported - 382,000, Revised - 386,000, Reported - up 15,000, Actual - up 18,000, Revision: +4,000

September 20: Reported - 382,000, Revised - 385,000, Reported - down 4,000, Actual - down 1,000, Revision: +3,000

September 27: Reported - 359,000, Revised - 363,000, Reported - down 16,000, Actual - down 12,000, Revision: +4,000

October 4: Reported - 367,000, Revised - 369,000, Reported - up 8,000, Actual - up 10,000, Revision: +2,000

October 11: Reported - 339,000, Revised - 342,000, Reported - down, Actual - ?????, Revision: +3,000

October 18: Reported - 388,000, Revised - 392,000, Reported - up 46,000, Actual - up 50,0000 Revision: +4,000

October 25: Reported - 369,000

 

The spin is in full gear....

 

 

Weekly Unemployment Claims Drop Slightly - Business - The Atlantic Wire

 

"The best one can say after such a small change is that things probably aren't getting worse at the moment. Not exactly the kind of news you hitch your wagon to."

 

Weekly Jobless Claims Drop, Job Market Healing - Careers Articles

 

"...giving a clearer sign that the labor market is healing after wild fluctuations in claims data at the beginning of the month.

 

...

 

The four-week moving average for jobless claims, which smooths out such volatility, rose 1,500 to a 368,000. Economists generally think a reading below 400,000 points to an increase in employment, with hiring likely to outpace layoffs."

 

 

So the four week moving average moved UP and this is good news?

 

And now 400,000 or less is a good number? If you go back you will find the exact same statement about the number 375,000. So is the media moving the the goal line or just redefining 'good' to fit the new normal?

  • Author

March 15: Reported - 351,000, Revised - 353,000

March 22: Reported - 348,000, Revised - 364,000 Reported - down 5,000, Actual - up 11,000, Revision: +16,000 ***

March 29: Reported - 359,000, Revised - 363,000 Reported - down 5,000, Actual - down 1,000, Revision: +4,000

April 05: Reported - 357,000, Revised - 367,000 Reported - down 6,000, Actual - up 4,000, Revision: +10,000 ***

April 12: Reported - 380,000, Revised - 388,000 Reported - up 13,000, Actual - up 21,000, Revision: +8,000

April 19: Reported - 386,000, Revised - 389,000 Reported - down 2,000, Actual - up 1,000, Revision: +3,000 ***

April 26: Reported - 388,000, Revised - 392,000 Reported - down 1,000, Actual - up 3,000, Revision: +4,000 ***

May 03: Reported - 365,000, Revised - 368,000 Reported - down 27,000, Actual - down 24,000, Revision: +3,000

May 10: Reported - 367,000, Revised - 370,000 Reported - down 1,000, Actual - up 2,000, Revision: +3,000 ***

May 17: Reported - 370,000, Revised - 372,000 Reported - no chg, Actual - up 2,000, Revision: +2,000 ***

May 24: Reported - 370,000, Revised - 373,000 Reported - down 2,000, Actual - up 1,000, Revision: +3,000 ***

May 31: Reported - 383,000, Revised - 389,000 Reported - up 10,000, Actual - up 16,000, Revision: +6,000

June 07: Reported - 377,000, Revised - 380,000 Reported - down 12,000, Actual - down 9,000, Revision: +3,000

June 14: Reported - 386,000, Revised - 389,000 Reported - up 6,000, Actual - 9,000, Revision: +3,000

June 21: Reported - 387,000, Revised - 392,000, Reported - down 2,000, Actual - up 3,000, Revision: +5,000 ***

June 28: Reported - 386,000, Revised - 388,000, Reported - down 6,000, Actual - down 4,000, Revision: +2,000

July 05: Reported - 374,000, Revised - 376,000, Reported - down 14,000, Actual - down 12,000, Revision" +2,000

July 12: Reported - 350,000, Revised - 352,000, Reported - down 26,000, Actual - down 24,000, Revision: +2,000

July 19: Reported - 386,000, Revised - 388,000, Reported - up 34,000, Actual - up 36,000, Revision: +2,000

July 26: Reported - 353,000, Revised - 357,000, Reported - down 25,000, Actual - down 21,000, Revision: +4,000

August 2: Reported - 365,000, Revised - 367,000, Reported - up 8,000, Actual - up 10,000, Revision: +2,000

August 9: Reported - 361,000, Revised - 364,000, Reported - down 6,000, Actual - down 3000, Revision: +3,000

August 16: Reported - 366,000. Revised - 368.000. Reported up 2000, Actual -up 4000, Revision: +2,000

August 23: Reported - 372,000.Revised - 374,000, Reported up 4000, Actual - up 6000, Revision: +2,000

August 30: Reported - 374,000. Revised - 377,000, Reported up 2000, Actual - up 3000, Revision: +3,000

September 6: Reported - 365,000, Revised - 367,000, Reported down 12,000, Actual - down 10,000, Revision: +2,000

September 13: Reported - 382,000, Revised - 386,000, Reported - up 15,000, Actual - up 18,000, Revision: +4,000

September 20: Reported - 382,000, Revised - 385,000, Reported - down 4,000, Actual - down 1,000, Revision: +3,000

September 27: Reported - 359,000, Revised - 363,000, Reported - down 16,000, Actual - down 12,000, Revision: +4,000

October 4: Reported - 367,000, Revised - 369,000, Reported - up 8,000, Actual - up 10,000, Revision: +2,000

October 11: Reported - 339,000, Revised - 342,000, Reported - down, Actual - ?????, Revision: +3,000

October 18: Reported - 388,000, Revised - 392,000, Reported - up 46,000, Actual - up 50,0000 Revision: +4,000

October 25: Reported - 369,000, Revised - 372,000, Reported - down 23,000, Actual - down 20,000, Revision: +3,000

November 1: Reported - 363,000

 

Legend:

Reported - initial number released each week

Revised - updated, supposedly more accurate number released 1 week after the initial report.

*** - This is a week were the increase or decrease was incorrectly reported when using the initial (Reported) value compared to the Revised value. Since these two number paired together usually generate the associated news headline. Between March and June this type of invalid reporting was common. Rarely do the news reports compare the Revised values to Revised values - a more accurate representation.

Bold - This is where the Revised value was 5,000 or more than the Reported value. The last time this occurred was June 21st.

375,000 - This is a number often quoted in articles indicating this is the 'break-even' point where if numbers are below this value you would expected the reported unemployment rate to reduce. This number was quoted in an AP article a while back with no source. It has become a common, but unsourced and non-validated value.

400,000 - The same break-even value quoted last week for the first time. Again, unsourced and non-validated.

Four week moving average - this value is the previous 4 weeks of REVISED numbers. So it uses the supposedly more accurate revised value and is less volatile (i.e. it swings a lot less than the week-to-week numbers).

 

Claims for unemployment aid drop to 363,000

 

From the link above:

 

"A more reliable gauge of hiring comes from the less volatile four-week moving average of claims for jobless benefits. The number dropped 1,500 to 367,250 last week, Labor said Thursday.

 

The four-week moving average has been at about the same level for three months. When this number and the overall number stay below 375,000 for weeks in a row, it suggests that companies are hiring at a modest pace."

Added about 170k jobs last month. Private gained 184k. Govt jobs decreased by about 14k.

 

Previous months revised. Added 84k more than initially reported.

 

UE rate when up from 7.8 to 7.9. More participating. I read that 500k joined the labor force.

 

Housing appears to be rebounding which led to a growth in construction jobs.

 

MFG jobs up 13k.

I think Neil Irwin of the WaPo says it best:

 

Neil Irwin ‏@Neil_Irwin

This report is not bad enough for Romney to make major hay over, not good enough for Obama to do end zone dance.

I think Neil Irwin of the WaPo says it best:

 

Neil Irwin ‏@Neil_Irwin

This report is not bad enough for Romney to make major hay over, not good enough for Obama to do end zone dance.

 

But I bet both of them try. :lol:

But I bet both of them try. :lol:

 

I'm waiting on Jack Welch's wisdom.

  • Author

 

Ohio, Pennsylvania hit hard? NY dropped?

 

No, no, no....its all Saaandy's fault (in best John Travolta voice)...

 

Superstorm Sandy drives US weekly unemployment aid applications up to 439,000 - The Washington Post

 

"Superstorm Sandy drove the number of people seeking unemployment benefits up to a seasonally adjusted 439,000 last week, the highest level in 18 months."

 

Lets check the source:

 

ETA Press Release: Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims Report

 

"The largest increases in initial claims for the week ending November 3 were in Pennsylvania (+7,766), Ohio (+6,450), New Jersey (+5,675), Michigan (+2,373), and Connecticut (+1,783), while the largest decreases were in California (-8,149), New York (-2,241), Florida (-939), Georgia (-913), and Indiana (-603). "

 

New Jersey? OK, lets blame some of the increase on Sandy and the snow storm. Lets say that accounts for 2/3 of that increase - that would be around 4,000+. Let even allocate some of Connecticuts increase to Sandy. But what about New York? It was hit hard in the city and and Long Island. New York went down. I would have expected Sandy to be hitting that state aw well. But NY went down.

 

So there is over 70,000 increase that is NOT accounted for with Sandy.

  • Author

Last weeks numbers revised upward 12,000 to 451,000. So this weeks 410,000 (initial) seems 'better'.

 

Sandy gets the blamed and some numbers do finally show NY and NJ getting hit hard. Interestingly, California comes in 3rd with a big jump.

 

Weekly Jobless Claims Fall | Fox Business

 

from above:

 

"The four-week moving average for jobless claims, which smoothes out volatility, rose 9,500 to 396,250. Economists generally think a reading below 400,000 points to an increase in employment."

 

Emphasis added.

 

Even Fox has moved the bar of what is 'good' from 375,000 to 400,000.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.