Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

BluegrassPreps.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

People honestly believe that the BCS would be better for College Football than this?

Which system do you prefer? 18 members have voted

  1. 1. Which system do you prefer?

    • The current BCS format
      22%
    • The Sports Illustrated proposal
      77%

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Featured Replies

If Cincinnati wins today they go 12-0 and get shut out of a chance to play for the mythical national championship. So in essence the "every game means something" is out the window.

The BCS motto: "Every game counts except when it doesn't." Apologies to Mike Decourcey from whom who I borrowed that line.

 

Exactly. TCU and Boise State also feel your pain. The BCS is just a horrible, horrible way to determine a "champion".

  • Replies 66
  • Views 2.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

If we learned anything for yesterdays games it should have been that perception and reality are not always the same. Until the games are played out on the field the champion will only be the perceived Champion and nothing more...

Mala, might agree with the Horns there but we played too many teams who when we played them were 1/5/6. TCU/Boise/Cincy/Horns cannot say that and if you differ on that point, convince me with numbers/facts.

No way UC is better than Florida? But how will we ever know?

 

We will find out soon enough... ;-)

Mala, might agree with the Horns there but we played too many teams who when we played them were 1/5/6. TCU/Boise/Cincy/Horns cannot say that and if you differ on that point, convince me with numbers/facts.
Why should it matter what they were ranked at the time? What is more telling is where they're ranked now that the season has played out.

 

Example ... Kentucky-Louisville in 2007. Louisville was ranked in the top 10 at the time, although it was painfully obvious very soon that the Cardinals weren't very good at all. Why should Kentucky have gotten credit for beating a top-10 team when it was clear that Louisville was overranked?

West, thats the way the BCS is set up as the season unfolds. Who would you put in the final game? Who ever it is I can counter with some Bama points.

West, thats the way the BCS is set up as the season unfolds. Who would you put in the final game? Who ever it is I can counter with some Bama points.
I've had Alabama as my #1 team all season, Larry ... I'm not arguing against them.

 

But it doesn't matter what a team was ranked when you played them. What matter is where they're ranked now.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.