October 8, 200916 yr I hardly ever watch Hannity (because by that time of night, the stories Hannity covers have already been discussed to death on other shows), and the show just isn't that interesting without Alan Colmes. However, I did watch the interview with Moore. Like some previous posters have stated, I was very impressed with the civility of the exchange and actually impressed with the arguments put forth by Moore. Though I may have disagreed with much of what he said, he made some solid points backed up by logic. I know some on here loathe FoxNews, but the Moore/Hannity discussion is a great example of a liberal vs. conservative discussion you simply would never see on many of the other news networks and probably another reason why Fox continues to reign supreme in the cable news world and continues to gain on the broadcast news programs. I completely agree with every point prior to the last paragraph. It was enjoyable. Hannity usually tries to run roughshod over his guests and often brings on weak opponents who cannot express themselves well. If Hannity conducted himself like this more often many more would watch him even if they disagreed with him. To your last paragraph, you rarely get that discussion ON Fox.
October 8, 200916 yr I completely agree with every point prior to the last paragraph. It was enjoyable. Hannity usually tries to run roughshod over his guests and often brings on weak opponents who cannot express themselves well. If Hannity conducted himself like this more often many more would watch him even if they disagreed with him. To your last paragraph, you rarely get that discussion ON Fox. I also watch CNN and on rare occaion MSNBC. I still argue that Fox gives you more 2 way discussions among opposing viewpoints than the others. No doubt some of those "conversations" are a bit disorderly or downright pathetic, but I still think Fox gives more representation from the opposition than the others.
October 8, 200916 yr I also watch CNN and on rare occaion MSNBC. I still argue that Fox gives you more 2 way discussions among opposing viewpoints than the others. No doubt some of those "conversations" are a bit disorderly or downright pathetic, but I still think Fox gives more representation from the opposition than the others. So, in other words, we should all wade through 10 miles of five-foot deep poo just to find a single 1/4-oz gold nugget that might actually surface?
October 8, 200916 yr So, in other words, we should all wade through 10 miles of five-foot deep poo just to find a single 1/4-oz gold nugget that might actually surface? Yes. That's how they got rich in Californy in the mid 1800's, metaphorically speaking.:thumb:
October 8, 200916 yr So, in other words, we should all wade through 10 miles of five-foot deep poo just to find a single 1/4-oz gold nugget that might actually surface? Unfortunately, that is our current news system.
October 8, 200916 yr :thumb: :thumb: I couldn't think of a more miserable experience than watching either one of them, and if you put them both together it has to be pure torture. :thumb:
October 8, 200916 yr I was kinda hoping that when they got in the same room together that it would be like matter and anti-matter and that they would both just disappear. :dancingpa:lol::thumb::ylsuper:
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.