October 4, 200917 yr Author Shayne Graham didn't make that last one by much. Brad St. Louis should be cut immediately. Carson came up huge on 4th & 10 in the OT. Great run. Great play. Chad & Carson are not on the same page. They're not even in the same chapter. Chris Henry needs more time. Bernard Scott looked solid in limited action. His running late in the 4th quarter really helped the Bengals stay in this one.
October 4, 200917 yr Author Ugly, but a win is a win. And even more important, NE beat the Ravens... Bengals are tied for 1st in the AFC North at 3-1.
October 4, 200917 yr Bengals won't lose to Cleveland mark it down. I'm just glad we won, I was hearing people say that Cincy had no chance in this game. :taz::thumb::sssh: Cleveland wins, I'll change my avatar for a month. Have you watched them play any this year? They aren't very good at all. :popcorn: I've seen the Bengals lose many a game they shouldn't have lost over these many years. I saw D. Anderson and the Browns put up over 50 points against the Bengals last year. I never take anything for granted with the Bengals. Like I said, I never take the Bengals for granted. I'll take the win, but they played awful. Thankfully the Patriots beat the Ravens today, and the Bengals are tied for first. :thumb:
October 4, 200917 yr Ugly, but a win is a win. And even more important, NE beat the Ravens... Bengals are tied for 1st in the AFC North at 3-1. :dancingpa:dancingpa Hey it was ugly we looked awful but they all look the same on the schedule.
October 4, 200917 yr Brad St. Louis should be cut tonight IMO. Does St. Louis do the long snapping on the punts also? Do the Bengals have somebody better to take his place?
October 4, 200917 yr Author Does St. Louis do the long snapping on the punts also? Do the Bengals have somebody better to take his place? Yes, he does. Is it possible that someone could be worse?
October 4, 200917 yr Yes, he does. Is it possible that someone could be worse? Yes it is, and that is probably why St. Louis made the team over them to begin with.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.