April 19, 200917 yr You are arguing he didn't bump him when you have just as much proof as the people that are saying he did bump him. Your track record does matter(Milton not you). :idunno: How can I provide proof of something that didn't happen? And for the record, you know my track record, is that I bump everyone:lol:
April 19, 200917 yr How can I provide proof of something that didn't happen? And for the record, you know my track record, is that I bump everyone:lol: The ump says it did so how are you gonna prove it didn't? I know your track record. :banana::sssh:
April 19, 200917 yr He made contact but it appeared to be unintentional, hence just a two game suspension which will likely be reduced to one game after appeal. Tick, tick, tick, tick, tick, tick.......
April 19, 200917 yr The ump says it did so how are you gonna prove it didn't? I know your track record. :banana::sssh: Actually the ump didn't say that, the dude standing behind 2nd base said it did...
April 19, 200917 yr And for the record, I concur that Bradley is a headcase, and great talent but he's out there and if any coach can keep him reigned in, its Lou, but in this situation, I think he's just a victim of his record and not of the particular situation.
April 19, 200917 yr Actually the ump didn't say that, the dude standing behind 2nd base said it did... :ohbrother:
April 19, 200917 yr :ohbrother: Just saying I think its funny that the one who was allegedly "violated" didn't file any complaint and some 3rd party cries wolf
April 19, 200917 yr Just saying I think its funny that the one who was allegedly "violated" didn't file any complaint and some 3rd party cries wolf I don't understand why you feel the need to stand up for a well known trouble maker. If he didn't have a Cubs uni on would you be defending him like this? I think it's funny you are saying he didn't him when you have no proof but yet you are saying the others are wrong who don't have proof either. :idunno:
April 19, 200917 yr I don't understand why you feel the need to stand up for a well known trouble maker. If he didn't have a Cubs uni on would you be defending him like this? I think it's funny you are saying he didn't him when you have no proof but yet you are saying the others are wrong who don't have proof either. :idunno: It's impossible to prove something that didn't happen? I posted a video of the link and see no bump. And I'm not debating that he's been a well known trouble maker, I'm debating THIS incident. I'm not saying he didn't blow out his knee going after an ump YEARS ago. Just that he didn't really do anything THIS time.
April 19, 200917 yr Author Hats touch, toes touch, anything of the such = suspended. The bum got what he deserved.
April 19, 200917 yr Hats touch, toes touch, anything of the such = suspended. The bum got what he deserved. :thumb::banana::dancingpa:ylsuper:
April 19, 200917 yr Hats touch, toes touch, anything of the such = suspended. The bum got what he deserved. We'll see:rolleyes:
April 19, 200917 yr :thumb::banana::dancingpa:ylsuper: You've got so many post in this thread, but ya haven't said anything:idunno::dancingpa:banana::deadhorse: :notworthy: :puke: :scared: :walk::taz::jump::cry: :eyeonyou: :irked: : :lol:
April 19, 200917 yr Refuting? More like regurgitating a mythical bump and past occurences that have nothing to do with this isolated incident,:thumb:
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.