April 19, 200917 yr To act like it's a horrible call is a joke. It's really close. Really its not that close, its 3" inside and 3-4" low. I know that sounds like not much, but in all reality thats a lot in MLB land
April 19, 200917 yr Watch at the point of impact where the ball hits the glove. MLB catchers are trained in the art of turning the glove in to give the appearance of a strike on a ball Really thanks for that info? :lol: The ball crosses the plate higher than where it hits the mit by the way.
April 19, 200917 yr Really its not that close, its 3" inside and 3-4" low. I know that sounds like not much, but in all reality thats a lot in MLB land :laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh: In Cubs land maybe.
April 19, 200917 yr Really thanks for that info? :lol: The ball crosses the plate higher than where it hits the mit by the way. Well then whoever that guy was has the best curveball in the game
April 19, 200917 yr :laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh: In Cubs land maybe. I'm gonna resort to Facebook to tell you what I think of you :lol:
April 19, 200917 yr Watch at the point of impact where the ball hits the glove. MLB catchers are trained in the art of turning the glove in to give the appearance of a strike on a ball Where the ball hits the catcher's glove is not relevant. I thought it was a great pitch. Probably a ball, but not nearly as clear cut as some would like to think.
April 19, 200917 yr I can't understand the controversy here. You make contact with an ump, you get suspended. Bradley made contact and got suspended....What am I missing that has caused this thing to turn into a 3 page thread?
April 19, 200917 yr I can't understand the controversy here. You make contact with an ump, you get suspended. Bradley made contact and got suspended....What am I missing that has caused this thing to turn into a 3 page thread? I agree. I guess the question is whether he made contact.
April 20, 200917 yr I'm glad someone here is unbiased:thumb: I try to be unbias, and usually state the facts, and fact of the matter is I do believe it was a ball but maybe not by much. Like you said, in that spot it could have cost the Cubs the game. But with that said, Rocket, man where've you been, I'm as big as Cubs fan as you are. :lol:
April 20, 200917 yr I can't understand the controversy here. You make contact with an ump, you get suspended. Bradley made contact and got suspended....What am I missing that has caused this thing to turn into a 3 page thread? I've yet to see any contact other than, the ump spinning his head around and the bills of there hats hitting, so in theory, shouldn't the ump be suspended for making contact with Bradley?:idunno::lol:
April 20, 200917 yr I try to be unbias, and usually state the facts, and fact of the matter is I do believe it was a ball but maybe not by much. Like you said, in that spot it could have cost the Cubs the game. But with that said, Rocket, man where've you been, I'm as big as Cubs fan as you are. :lol: I dunno, I drink heavily at times :puke:
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.