Watching dunks, talking about dunks, listing how many dunks someone has, I do think that has been mentioned by some.:idunno:

But it always seems to be important to post how many dunks in a game, if they were monster, etc.:puke:

Overall cocept is that does not mean how good a team is.

Overall cocept is that does not mean how good a team is.

 

:thumb:

Watching dunks, talking about dunks, listing how many dunks someone has, I do think that has been mentioned by some.:idunno:

 

But it always seems to be important to post how many dunks in a game, if they were monster, etc.:puke:

 

Overall cocept is that does not mean how good a team is.

 

So you're saying when a kid is dunking 3 and 4 times a game over defenders, that doesn't show how dominant he is? Isn't that what made Shaq such a dominant household force? His ability to consistently get high percentage shots from dunking? Also nobody said it makes a team good...but it does show their ability to play above the rim, which makes them tough to rebound against. Just because certain schools don't have players dunking night in and night out like Holmes, doesn't mean someone should be bashed for showing a highlight from a game...especially the one from Pittman, which you rarely see at the high school level from your "average" ball player.

Perhaps some should revisit the thread titles from time to time. This one is finished.