December 18, 200817 yr Author Moore is in right now, Evans has been stinking it up for quite a while.
December 18, 200817 yr Moore is in right now, Evans has been stinking it up for quite a while. Preaching to the choir . . . . :irked:
December 18, 200817 yr Author Preaching to the choir . . . . :irked: I know but I just know he is going to go off one week, his past history he finishes strong every year. But this Qb does'nt even look at him. You watch this will be the week (with my luck) against a not so good Bronco defense.
December 18, 200817 yr I am in 3 different leagues and all three handle it differently. 1) Most points scored by QB. 2) Most bench points. 3) Fractional points. Personally, I like the Fractional Points as the best option, followed by Bench Points. The Highest QB is questionable IMO opinion, but I'm not the commish of that league. First off, bad mistake that your league didn't address this beforehand, but I'm sure you don't need to be told this. I think picking the higher seed is extremely unfair. Frankly, a coin flip would be a fairer option than that. I'm with you... The fractional points allows you to solve the problem with the lineup the managers chose to play. Also, fractional points determines whose lineup actually performed the best. If you finished tied, but your guys had 20 more yards, then your lineup did better. That's the best way to do it, IMO. If you're still tied after that...then bench points.
December 18, 200817 yr The tiebreaker in the league I'm in uses points scored by Defenses as the tiebreaker.
December 18, 200817 yr I lucked out a little in the league I'm commish of, where a player needed Philly's Defense to get a turnover to tie last week, and they dropped an INT on the last Cleveland offensive play. I have no tiebreakers in place, and this now gives me a chance to define those. I think the best would be to start with bench points, then defensive points, then something like TDs scored.
December 18, 200817 yr I lucked out a little in the league I'm commish of, where a player needed Philly's Defense to get a turnover to tie last week, and they dropped an INT on the last Cleveland offensive play. I have no tiebreakers in place, and this now gives me a chance to define those. I think the best would be to start with bench points, then defensive points, then something like TDs scored. I still think fractional points should be the first tiebreaker...that way you can solve the problem with the actual lineups the managers chose. And, the guy who wins will be the one whose starting lineup produced the most. That's just my personal preference.
December 18, 200817 yr I still think fractional points should be the first tiebreaker...that way you can solve the problem with the actual lineups the managers chose. And, the guy who wins will be the one whose starting lineup produced the most. That's just my personal preference. My only problem with fractional points is that I'm lazy, and just plain don't want to count those up.
December 19, 200817 yr My only problem with fractional points is that I'm lazy, and just plain don't want to count those up. Fair enough. :lol:
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.